The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem‐solving strategies
Abstract
This study investigates links between children's social behaviour and their sociometric status, empathy and social problem‐solving strategies. Sociometric ratings were obtained from a sample of 131 9–10‐year‐old children drawn from two matched schools. Each child also completed a newly developed and empirically derived Social Behaviour Questionnaire. This questionnaire led to the identification of 21 prosocial children, 23 bullies and 14 victims of bullying. Children in these subgroups were then assessed on measures of empathy and social problem‐solving. Prosocial children were significantly more popular than the other role groups, and bully‐victims were most frequently rejected by their peers. Prosocial children also showed greater empathic awareness than either bullies or victims, but gender was the significant source of variance. Prosocial children and victims responded more constructively than did bullies to socially awkward situations, and bullies were less aware than prosocial children of the possible negative consequences of their solution strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bullying and the peer group: A review
Salmivalli, C. (2010) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007 · Cited by 1,757
Social-emotional competence as support for school readiness: What is it and how do we assess it?
Denham, S. A. (2006) · Early Education & Development · doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1701_4 · Cited by 879
Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x · Cited by 688
What Can Be Done About School Bullying?: Linking Research to Educational Practice
Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09357622 · Cited by 672
The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Authors
- Warden, D., & MacKinnon, S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Developmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-385
- ISSN
- 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-835X
- OpenAlex
- W2115647080
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem‐solving strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/026151003322277757
- The paper
- Warden, D., & MacKinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem‐solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003322277757
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.