Cited by 672Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingLegal Issues in Education

What Can Be Done About School Bullying?: Linking Research to Educational Practice

Swearer, Susan M., Espelage, Dorothy L., Vaillancourt, Tracy, Hymel, Shelley·2010·Educational Researcher

Abstract

In this article, the authors review research on individual, peer, and school contributions that may be critical factors for enhancing efforts to address bullying among students. Methodological challenges are delineated, with an emphasis on how bullying is defined and assessed and the subsequent implications for bullying prevention and intervention program evaluation. The impact of school-based anti-bullying programs and the challenges currently facing educators and researchers in this area are discussed. The article concludes with a proposal for a broader, ecologically based model of school bullying based on the emerging literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x09357622

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CFL affect learning both directly and indirectly.

    “CFL affect learning both directly (e.g., effects on working memory, cognitive load, developmental range) and indirectly (e.g., effects on teacher stress, student stress, ability of each to attune to the other; Swearer, Espelage, Vaillancourt, & Hymel, 2010).”

    From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context<sup>1</sup> (2019) · cites this paper as Swearer, Espelage, Vaillancourt, & Hymel, 2010

  • Anti-bullying interventions at the school level have variable effects, but the most consistent results appear when strategies simultaneously include clear anti-bullying rules, a curriculum focused on diversity and inclusion, teacher training, parental involvement, and constant monitoring mechanisms.

    “Swearer et al. (2010) argue that anti-bullying interventions at the school level have variable effects, but the most consistent results appear when strategies simultaneously include clear anti-bullying rules, a curriculum focused on diversity and inclusion, teacher training, parental involvement, and constant monitoring mechanisms.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2010-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
38-47
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2123123351
Cited by
672
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 46
FWCI
69.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
school bullying, bullying prevention, bullying prevention programs, bullying assessment, definition of bullying, program evaluation, peer factors, school factors, personal factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review