The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates
Abstract
To examine factors influencing readiness for healthcare organizational change, 654 randomly selected hospital staff completed questionnaires measuring the logistical and occupational risks of change, ability to cope with change and to solve jobrelated problems, social support, measures of Karasek's (1979) active vs. passive job construct (job demand× decision latitude) and readiness for organizational change. Workers in active jobs (Karasek, 1979) which afforded higher decision latitude and control over challenging tasks reported a higher readiness for organizational change scores. Workers with an active approach to job problem‐solving with higher job change self‐efficacy scores reported a higher readiness for change. In hierarchical regression analyses, active jobs, an active job problem‐solving style and job‐change self‐efficacy contributed independently to the prediction of readiness for organizational change. Time 1 readiness for organizational change scores and an active approach to job problem‐solving were the best predictors of participation in redesign activities during a year‐long re‐engineering programme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
The measurement of experienced burnout
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030020205 · Cited by 14,496
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Cited by
Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636 · Cited by 2,006
Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale
Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886306295295 · Cited by 1,243
Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1783 · Cited by 1,026
Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change: A 60-Year Review of Quantitative Studies
Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886310396550 · Cited by 1,016
Weiner, B. J., Amick, H., & Lee, S.-Y. D. (2008) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558708317802 · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., & Brown, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 377-392
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2015773269
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317902321119637
- The paper
- Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., & Brown, J. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.