The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study
Abstract
This longitudinal field study examined the relationship between perceived person–job (PJ) and person–organization (PO) fit and organizational attraction, intentions to accept a job offer, and actual job offer decision. Data were collected from 193 graduate applicants prior to the selection process, during the selection process, at the end of the selection process, and after job acceptance decision. The findings showed support for the hypothesis that perceptions of PJ and PO fit influenced attraction at different stages of selection. The second hypothesis that the relationship between perceptions of PJ and PO fit and intentions to accept a job offer are mediated by organizational attraction was partially supported. Mid‐selection, the relationship between PJ fit perceptions and intentions to accept a job offer was mediated by organizational attraction; in contrast, at the end of the selection process, there was a direct relationship between PJ fit perceptions and intentions. PO fit perceptions were unrelated to intentions to accept a job offer. PJ and PO fit perceptions (before and during the selection process) were unrelated to actual job acceptance decision. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring that applicants have sufficient information about the job during the recruitment and selection process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875 · Cited by 2,224
Cited by
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12258 · Cited by 1,050
Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.538978 · Cited by 463
Al-enabled biometrics in recruiting: insights from marketers for managers
van Esch, P., Stewart Black, J., Franklin, D., & Harder, M. (2021) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.04.003 · Cited by 36
Leadership Succession Planning and Organization Transition: A Review of Literature
K.Siambi, J. (2022) · International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research · doi:10.20431/2349-0349.1003003 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Carless, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-429
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2171105413
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317905x25995
- The paper
- Carless, S. A. (2005). Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905x25995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.