Cited by 141Body Image and Dysmorphia Studiesmelanin and skin pigmentationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Living with vitiligo: Dealing with difference

Thompson, Andrew R., Kent, Gerry, Smith, Jonathan A.·2002·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Individuals with a disfigurement are at risk of experiencing psychological distress, but the level of this distress is only marginally associated with clinical severity. This study examines the experience of living with the skin condition vitiligo with a view towards understanding its impact and the ways in which participants deal with this chronic and disfiguring disease. DESIGN: The qualitative method Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used. METHODS: In a semi-structured interview, seven white female vitiligo sufferers were asked to describe their experiences from the time the vitiligo first became apparent to the time of the interview. They were encouraged to elaborate on their own reactions and how they dealt with the reactions of others. RESULTS: Initially, participants felt overwhelmed by their illness but over time they developed several strategies in order to 'contain' their difference in appearance within manageable limits. The behavioural strategies of avoidance and concealment had several disadvantages, whereas cognitive strategies were less problematic but difficult to sustain consistently. Social support served to facilitate the development of coping methods associated with acceptance of difference. However, maintaining this acceptance was a struggle and the process fragile. CONCLUSIONS: Living with vitiligo was a continuous struggle. The results are consistent with Leventhal's (1970) notion that coping is a problem-solving process and with Moos and Schaefer's (1984) contention that dealing with a chronic disease involves the development of a variety of strategies in order to regain equilibrium. Further research is needed to examine whether the experiences described here are common to other disfiguring conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/135910702169457

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, A. R., Kent, G., & Smith, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Andrew R.
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
213-225
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W2143838698
Cited by
141
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
vitiligo, coping strategies, disfigurement, psychological distress, concealment, avoidance, social support, acceptance of differences, chronic disease, lived experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review