Cited by 102Student Stress and CopingHigher Education Research StudiesEmployment and Welfare Studies

The impact of financial circumstances on student health

Open access
Jessop, Donna C., Herberts, Carolina., Solomon, Lucy.·2005·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of students' financial circumstances on their mental and physical health. DESIGN: The study employed a correlational design. METHODS: An opportunity sample of 89 British students and 98 Finnish students completed a questionnaire which assessed their amount of debt, financial concerns, mental and physical health, smoking and drinking behaviours, work in addition to study, and perceptions of control. RESULTS: British students reported greater levels of debt and financial concern than Finnish students. They also reported significantly worse mental and physical health on a variety of dimensions. Financial concern was a significant linear predictor of mental and physical health, with increased financial concern being consistently associated with worse health. There was no evidence that students' smoking or drinking behaviour, work in addition to study, or perceptions of control substantially mediated the relationship between financial concern and health. CONCLUSION: The results support the position that students' financial circumstances might have serious implications for their health. It is proposed, therefore, that recent changes in government funding policies for students could have a negative impact on student health and exacerbate finance-related health inequalities. Further research is required to identify factors that may mediate or moderate the impact of financial concern on health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/135910705x25480

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jessop, D. C., Herberts, C., & Solomon, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Middlesex University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jessop, Donna C.
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
421-439
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W1965893420
Cited by
102
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
student debt, financial concerns, student mental health, student physical health, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption, part-time work while studying, perceived control, health disparities, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Cross-Cultural Comparison, England, Female, Financing, Government, Finland, Health Status, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review