The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)
Open accessAbstract
micropore filling.The BET method is unlikely to yield a value of the actual surface area if the isotherm is either Type I or Type III; but both Type II and Type IV isotherms are, in general, amenable to the BET analysis, provided that the value of C is neither too low nor too high and that the BET plot is linear in the region of the isotherm containing Point B.The computation of mesopore size distribution is valid only if the isotherm is of Type IV, but in view of the complexity of most pore systems little is to be gained by the application of an elaborate method of computation.If a Type I isotherm exhibits a nearly constant adsorption at high relative pressure, the micropore volume is given by the amount adsorbed at the plateau.At present there is no reliable procedure available for the computation of the micropore size distribution from a single isotherm.A check list is recommended to assist authors in the measurement of adsorption isotherms and the presentation of the data in the primary literature. CONTENTS SECTION 1.Recent work has drawn attention to the complexity of capillary condensation in pore networks and has indicated that a pore size distribution curve derived from the desorption branch of the loop is likely to be unreliable if pore blocking effects occur.It is significant that a very steep desorption branch is usually found if the lower closure point of the loop is located at the limiting p/p° (see Section 5.3).In particular, the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While, the adsorption capacities of the three specimens increase to a limiting value near a straight line when the relative pressures (P/P0) are extremely low, which meets the requirements of the Type I adsorption isotherms [21]”
From Modified coconut shell biochars (MCSBCs): Fabrication and their adsorptions for Pb(II) (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Obtained pigments have an isotherm shape corresponding to types IV and V according to the IUPAC classification [63,64] (Figure 3).”
From Studies of the Morphology of Hematite Synthesized from Waste Iron Sulfate (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The IeV profile of the Mo-RF electrode in Fig. 6 show similar shape with commercial electrode performance in alkaline electrolysers as reported by Amitava [37].”
From Investigation of molybdenum-(resorcinol–formaldehyde) (Mo-RF) electrode for alkaline electrolyser operation (2011) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The cell electrode voltage of the Mo-RF at 298 K in Table 1 are at lower ranges compared with similar IeV profile at 348 K in that report.”
From Investigation of molybdenum-(resorcinol–formaldehyde) (Mo-RF) electrode for alkaline electrolyser operation (2011) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, D., Huo, Q., Feng, J., Chmelka, B. F., & Stucky, G. D. (1998) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja974025i · Cited by 6,696
Carbon-Based Supercapacitors Produced by Activation of Graphene
Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Stoller, M. D., Ganesh, K. J., Cai, W., Ferreira, P. J., Pirkle, A. R., Wallace, R. M., Cychosz, K. A., Thommes, M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200770 · Cited by 6,134
Carbon properties and their role in supercapacitors
Pandolfo, A. G., & Hollenkamp, A. F. (2006) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.065 · Cited by 4,204
Gas Adsorption Characterization of Ordered Organic−Inorganic Nanocomposite Materials
Kruk, M., & Jaroniec, M. (2001) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm0101069 · Cited by 3,409
Carbon materials for chemical capacitive energy storage
Zhai, Y., Dou, Y., Zhao, D., Fulvio, P. F., Mayes, R. T., & Dai, S. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201100984 · Cited by 2,964
Metadata
- Authors
- Sing, K. S. W.
- Corresponding author
- Sing, K. S. W.
- Venue
- Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-619
- ISSN
- 0033-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3075
- OpenAlex
- W1980704616
- Cited by
- 24,485
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 917 · 2025: 1216 · 2024: 1289 · 2023: 1250 · 2022: 1384 · 2021: 1353 · 2020: 1435 · 2019: 1478 · 2018: 1441 · 2017: 1442 · 2016: 1401 · 2015: 1319 · 2014: 1238 · 2013: 1116 · 2012: 959
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pure and Applied Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- physisorption, gas-solid systems, surface area determination, porosity determination, reporting recommendations, adsorption isotherms, BET method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review