The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems (IUPAC Technical Report)
Open accessAbstract
Advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs), which involve the in situ generation of highly potent chemical oxidants, such as the hydroxyl radical (áOH), have emerged as an important class of technologies for accelerating the oxidation (and hence removal) of a wide range of organic contaminants in polluted water and air. In this report, standard figures-of-merit are proposed for the comparison and evaluation of these waste treatment technologies. These figures-of-merit are based on electric-energy consumption (for electric-energy-driven systems) or collector area (for solar-energy-driven systems). They fit within two phenomenological kinetic order regimes: 1) for high contaminant concentrations (electric energy per mass, E EM, or collector area per mass, A CM) and 2) for low concentrations (electric energy per order of magnitude, E EO, or collector area per order of magnitude, A CO). Furthermore, a simple understanding of the overall kinetic behavior of organic contaminant removal in a waste stream (i.e., whether zero- or first-order) is shown to be necessary for the description of meaningful electric- or solar-energy efficiencies. These standard figures-of-merit provide a direct link to the electric- or solar-energy efficiency (lower values mean higher efficiency) of an advanced oxidation technology, independent of the nature of the system, and therefore allow for direct comparison of widely disparate AOTs. These figures-of-merit are also shown to be inversely proportional to fundamental efficiency factors, such as the lamp efficiency (for electrical systems), the fraction of the emitted light that is absorbed in the aqueous solution, and the quantum yield of generation of active radicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Electro-Fenton Process and Related Electrochemical Technologies Based on Fenton’s Reaction Chemistry
Brillas, E., Sirés, I., & Oturan, M. A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900136g · Cited by 3,437
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends
Malato, S., Fernández-Ibáñez, P., Maldonado, M. I., Blanco, J., & Gernjak, W. (2009) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,004
Electrocatalytic reduction of nitrate – a step towards a sustainable nitrogen cycle
Xu, H., Ma, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, W.-X., & Yang, J. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00857a · Cited by 1,160
Homogeneous photo-Fenton processes at near neutral pH: A review
Clarizia, L., Russo, D., Di Somma, I., Marotta, R., & Andreozzi, R. (2017) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.011 · Cited by 833
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolton, J. R., Bircher, K. G., Tumas, W., & Tolman, C. A.
- Venue
- Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 627-637
- ISSN
- 0033-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3075
- OpenAlex
- W2016619508
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems (IUPAC Technical Report). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1351/pac200173040627
- The paper
- Bolton, J. R., Bircher, K. G., Tumas, W., & Tolman, C. A. (2001). Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200173040627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.