The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report)
Open accessAbstract
Method validation is one of the measures universally recognized as a necessary part of a comprehensive system of quality assurance in analytical chemistry. In the past, ISO, IUPAC, and AOAC International have cooperated to produce agreed protocols or guidelines on the "Design, conduct and interpretation of method performance studies" [1], on the "Proficiency testing of (chemical) analytical laboratories" [2], on "Internal quality control in analytical chemistry laboratories" [3], and on "The use of recovery information in analytical measurement" [4]. The Working Group that produced these protocols/guidelines has now been mandated by IUPAC to prepare guidelines on the single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. These guidelines provide minimum recommendations on procedures that should be employed to ensure adequate validation of analytical methods. A draft of the guidelines has been discussed at an International Symposium on the Harmonization of Quality Assurance Systems in Chemical Laboratory, the proceedings from which have been published by the UK Royal Society of Chemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., Beale, M. H., Beger, R., Daykin, C. A., Fan, T. W.-M., Fiehn, O., Goodacre, R., Griffin, J. L., et al. (2007) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 · Cited by 5,368
Validation of Laboratory-Developed Molecular Assays for Infectious Diseases
Burd, E. M. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00074-09 · Cited by 550
Quantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: status and perspectives
Koek, M. M., Jellema, R. H., van der Greef, J., Tas, A. C., & Hankemeier, T. (2011) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-010-0254-3 · Cited by 353
Method validation strategies involved in non-targeted metabolomics
Naz, S., Vallejo, M., García, A., & Barbas, C. (2014) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.071 · Cited by 332
Prates, D. D. F., Radmann, E. M., Duarte, J. H., Morais, M. G. D., & Costa, J. A. V. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.122 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, M., Ellison, S. L. R., & Wood, R.
- Venue
- Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 835-855
- ISSN
- 0033-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3075
- OpenAlex
- W2064305654
- Cited by
- 2,478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1351/pac200274050835
- The paper
- Thompson, M., Ellison, S. L. R., & Wood, R. (2002). Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274050835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.