The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of the term "recovery" and "apparent recovery" in analytical procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)
Open accessAbstract
The terms recovery and apparent recovery are recommended to avoid confusion caused by the use of the term recovery to cover two distinct situations. These situations deal with: (a) the yield of a preconcentration or extraction stage of an analytical process (where recovery is recommended) and (b) the quantity observed value/reference value, obtained using an analytical procedure that involves a calibration graph (where apparent recovery is recommended).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sulyok, M., Stadler, D., Steiner, D., & Krska, R. (2020) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9 · Cited by 253
Laboratory medicine best practice guideline: vitamins a, e and the carotenoids in blood.
(2014) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44
Greaves, R. F., Jolly, L., Hartmann, M. F., Ho, C. S., Kam, R. K. T., Joseph, J., Boyder, C., & Wudy, S. A. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0394 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, D. T., Danzer, K., & Townshend, A.
- Venue
- Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2201-2205
- ISSN
- 0033-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3075
- OpenAlex
- W2038323155
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the term "recovery" and "apparent recovery" in analytical procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1351/pac200274112201
- The paper
- Burns, D. T., Danzer, K., & Townshend, A. (2002). Use of the term "recovery" and "apparent recovery" in analytical procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274112201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
