The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report)
Open accessAbstract
A consistent set of internationally accepted atomic weights has long been an essential aim of the scientific community because of the relevance of these values to science and technology, as well as to trade and commerce subject to ethical, legal, and international standards. The standard atomic weights of the elements are regularly evaluated, recommended, and published in updated tables by the Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances (CAWIA) of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). These values are invariably associated with carefully evaluated uncertainties. Atomic weights were originally determined by mass ratio measurements coupled with an understanding of chemical stoichiometry, but are now based almost exclusively on knowledge of the isotopic composition (derived from isotope-abundance ratio measurements) and the atomic masses of the isotopes of the elements. Atomic weights and atomic masses are now scaled to a numerical value of exactly 12 for the mass of the carbon isotope of mass number 12. Technological advances in mass spectrometry and nuclear-reaction energies have enabled atomic masses to be determined with a relative uncertainty of better than 1 ×10−7 . Isotope abundances for an increasing number of elements can be measured to better than 1 ×10−3 . The excellent precision of such measurements led to the discovery that many elements, in different specimens, display significant variations in their isotope-abundance ratios, caused by a variety of natural and industrial physicochemical processes. While such variations increasingly place a constraint on the uncertainties with which some standard atomic weights can be stated, they provide numerous opportunities for investigating a range of important phenomena in physical, chemical, cosmological, biological, and industrial processes. This review reflects the current and increasing interest of science in the measured differences between source-specific and even sample-specific atomic weights. These relative comparisons can often be made with a smaller uncertainty than is achieved in the best calibrated “absolute ” (=SI-traceable) atomic-weight determinations. Accurate determinations of the atomic weights of certain elements also influence the values of fundamental constants such as the Avogadro, Faraday, and universal gas constants. This review is in two parts: the first summarizes the development of the science of atomic-weight determinations during the 20th century; the second summarizes the changes and variations that have been recognized in the values and uncertainties of atomic weights, on an element-by-element basis, in the latter part of the 20th century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carlson, R. W. (1987) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(87)90361-9 · Cited by 2,745
Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology
(2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4557-6 · Cited by 1,408
HANDBOOK OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISOTOPE GEOCHEMISTRY
(1986) · The Terrestrial Environment, B · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-42225-5.50001-2 · Cited by 1,085
松永, 俊. (1997) · Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · Cited by 996
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
Taylor, B. N., & Kuyatt, C. E. (1995) · Cited by 823
Biogeochemistry of Sulfur Isotopes
Canfield, D. E. (2001) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607 · Cited by 718
Hut, G. (1987) · Cited by 482
Stable isotopes : natural and anthropogenic sulphur in the environment
Krouse, H. R., & Grinenko, V. A. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 448
Bogard, D. (1984) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(84)90044-9 · Cited by 389
Hoefs, J. (2018) · Springer Textbooks in Earth Sciences, Geography and Environment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78527-1 · Cited by 346
Cited by
First-principles Phonon Calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py
Togo, A. (2023) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.92.012001 · Cited by 1,865
Kind, T., & Fiehn, O. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-105 · Cited by 1,201
Atomic weights of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report)
Meija, J., Coplen, T. B., Berglund, M., Brand, W. A., De Bièvre, P., Gröning, M., Holden, N. E., Irrgeher, J., Loss, R. D., Walczyk, T., et al. (2016) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1515/pac-2015-0305 · Cited by 747
Self-citationNatural fractionation of 238U/235U
Weyer, S., Anbar, A. D., Gerdes, A., Gordon, G. W., Algeo, T. J., & Boyle, E. A. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.012 · Cited by 509
Tracking heavy water (D 2 O) incorporation for identifying and sorting active microbial cells
Berry, D., Mader, E., Lee, T. K., Woebken, D., Wang, Y., Zhu, D., Palatinszky, M., Schintlmeister, A., Schmid, M. C., Hanson, B. T., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420406112 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- de Laeter, J. R., Böhlke, J. K., De Bièvre, P., Hidaka, H., Peiser, H. S., Rosman, K. J. R., & Taylor, P. D. P.
- Venue
- Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 683-800
- ISSN
- 0033-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3075
- OpenAlex
- W2085562887
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 28.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1351/pac200375060683
- The paper
- de Laeter, J. R., Böhlke, J. K., De Bièvre, P., Hidaka, H., Peiser, H. S., Rosman, K. J. R., & Taylor, P. D. P. (2003). Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.