The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Training Needs of Direct Support Staff
Abstract
Public spending for MR/DD services grew rapidly during FYs 2000-2002. This rapid growth was followed by reductions in spending for MR/DD services as the nation's economy declined during 2002-2004. However, convergent factors stimulating future expansion of funding and services for persons with MR/DD include rapidly expanding cohorts of aging caregivers in the states, increasing longevity of persons with MR/DD, and extensive litigation in the states promoting access to services.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Time to conduct training sessions that involve disruption to consumer services is a noted concern of agency administrators (Test, Flowers, Hewitt, & Solow, 2004).”
From Evidence-Based Staff Training: A Guide for Practitioners (2012) · cites this paper as Test, Flowers, Hewitt, & Solow, 2004
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Test, D. W., Flowers, C., Hewitt, A., Solow, J., & Taylor, S. J.
- Affiliations
- (dwtest@email.uncc.edu),
- University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, 107 PT H, 150 Pillsbury Dr., SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- College of Education, Special Education Program, 9201, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223
- Venue
- Mental Retardation
- Published
- 2004
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training Needs of Direct Support Staff. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42%3C327:tnodss%3E2.0.co;2
- The paper
- Test, D. W., Flowers, C., Hewitt, A., Solow, J., & Taylor, S. J. (2004). Training Needs of Direct Support Staff. Mental Retardation. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42%3C327%3Atnodss%3E2.0.co%3B2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
