The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Personal Control and the Ecology of Community Living Settings: Beyond Living-Unit Size and Type
Abstract
Differences and similarities between brothers and sisters of adults with mental retardation with respect to the instrumental (caregiving, companionship) and affective (positive affect, emotion) aspects of the sibling relationship were examined. Sisters scored higher than brothers in the caregiving, companionship, and positive affect aspects of the sibling relationship. Brothers' sibling relationships were conditioned by the gender of the sibling with mental retardation. Brothers of brothers with mental retardation had a more favorable emotional response than did brothers of sisters. Two-wave longitudinal data showed that sibling involvement and closeness increased over time, but was dependent upon changes in the health of the mother. The findings are discussed in relation to normative patterns in the sibling relationship across the life course.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although subsequent intervention studies, including a randomized, controlled trial,7 have documented improvements in IQ for a subgroup of children, questions regarding the efficacy of early intervention have remained.”
From Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Intervention for Toddlers With Autism: The Early Start Denver Model (2010) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Even with this scaffolding, however, reward-based interventions are not successful for all children with ASD [579-582]”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [581]
In the citing paper
“For example, in two randomized controlled experiments examining outcomes of comprehensive intervention, spoken language standard scores significantly improved only after two years of intensive treatment in one study19 and were non-significant in the other.20”
From Longitudinal follow-up of children with autism receiving targeted interventions on joint attention and play (2012) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Early intensive behavioral intervention is recognized as an efficacious approach for improving outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).”
From Long-Term Outcomes of Early Intervention in 6-Year-Old Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Intellectual ability, communication and language functioning, adaptive behavior, and educational placement and support have all been demonstrated to improve with early intervention.1–3”
From Long-Term Outcomes of Early Intervention in 6-Year-Old Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
1 more claim about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Stancliffe, R. J., Abery, B. H., & Smith, J.
- Venue
- American Journal on Mental Retardation
- Published
- 2000
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personal Control and the Ecology of Community Living Settings: Beyond Living-Unit Size and Type. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105%3C0431:pcateo%3E2.0.co;2
- The paper
- Stancliffe, R. J., Abery, B. H., & Smith, J. (2000). Personal Control and the Ecology of Community Living Settings: Beyond Living-Unit Size and Type. American Journal on Mental Retardation. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105%3C0431%3Apcateo%3E2.0.co%3B2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
