The Hacker Conference: A Ritual Condensation and Celebration of a Lifeworld
Abstract
This piece draws on ethnographic experience at various hacker conferences to rethink how face-to-face interactions work in concert with digital interactivity to constitute social worlds. Through a process of ritual condensation and emotional celebration, the conference works to perform and thus confirm what are otherwise more frequent, though more prosaic forms of virtual sociality. This focus allows me to decenter the historical priority placed on digital interactivity and examine the complementary and intertwined relationships between face-to-face interactions and online interactivity among a group of people often thought of as the quintessential digital subjects. More generally, approaching the conference in light of its ritual characteristics may also demonstrate how social enchantment and moral solidarity, often thought to play only a marginal role in the march of secular and liberal modernity, is in fact central to its unfolding.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meetings serve to strengthen and celebrate bonds and common identity.
“Los encuentros sirven para el fortalecimiento y la celebración de los vínculos y la identidad común (Coleman, 2010).”
From Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome (2020) · cites this paper as Coleman, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Coleman, G.
- Corresponding author
- Coleman, Gabriella
- ORCID
- Coleman, Gabriella
- Venue
- Anthropological Quarterly
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-72
- ISSN
- 0003-5491 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-1518
- OpenAlex
- W2093833192
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 133.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anthropological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Arts and Performance Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Social and Educational Issues
- Keywords
- face-to-face interaction, digital interactivity, moral solidarity, hackers, online communities, secular modernity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review