Cited by 92Arts and Performance StudiesAnthropological Studies and InsightsContemporary Social and Educational Issues

The Hacker Conference: A Ritual Condensation and Celebration of a Lifeworld

Coleman, Gabriella·2010·Anthropological Quarterly

Abstract

This piece draws on ethnographic experience at various hacker conferences to rethink how face-to-face interactions work in concert with digital interactivity to constitute social worlds. Through a process of ritual condensation and emotional celebration, the conference works to perform and thus confirm what are otherwise more frequent, though more prosaic forms of virtual sociality. This focus allows me to decenter the historical priority placed on digital interactivity and examine the complementary and intertwined relationships between face-to-face interactions and online interactivity among a group of people often thought of as the quintessential digital subjects. More generally, approaching the conference in light of its ritual characteristics may also demonstrate how social enchantment and moral solidarity, often thought to play only a marginal role in the march of secular and liberal modernity, is in fact central to its unfolding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/anq.0.0112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 92

Authors
Coleman, G.
Corresponding author
Coleman, Gabriella
Venue
Anthropological Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2010-12
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
47-72
ISSN
  • 0003-5491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-1518
OpenAlex
W2093833192
Cited by
92
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
133.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anthropological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Arts and Performance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Social and Educational Issues
Keywords
face-to-face interaction, digital interactivity, moral solidarity, hackers, online communities, secular modernity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review