The DOI matches its Crossref record; 178 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 119 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, I argue that the traditional narrative of Iphigenia's sacrifice lies allusively behind the opening scenes of the Iliad (1.8-487). Scholars have long suspected that this episode is evoked in Agamemnon's scathing rebuke of Calchas (1.105-8), but I contend that this is only one moment in a far more sustained allusive dialogue: both the debate over Chryseis and her eventual return to her father replay and rework the sacrifice story. The Iliad begins by recalling the start of the whole Trojan war.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that the traditional story of Iphigenia’s sacrifice lies behind the opening of *Iliad* 1, not merely behind Agamemnon’s rebuke of Calchas. It contends that the quarrel over Chryseis and her return to Chryses replay and rework the Iphigenia fabula through a sustained sequence of thematic and structural parallels.
Key findings
- The paper identifies six core elements of the Iphigenia fabula (A–F) and finds all six reflected in the same order in *Iliad* 1.8–487: Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished; Calchas reveals divine anger and proposes that Agamemnon give up a prized woman; Achilles loses a potential bride; Odysseus brings the woman to her father at the altar; sacrifice occurs at the altar; and the offended deity sends a favorable wind for sailing.
- Specific correspondences include Agamemnon’s insult to Apollo and Chryses, followed by plague, as a replay of his offense against Artemis and the storm at Aulis; Calchas’s prophecy about returning Chryseis as a replay of his Aulis prophecy about Iphigenia; Odysseus leading Chryseis to Chryses at the altar (1.440–41) as an echo of bringing Iphigenia to Agamemnon; and the sacrifice at Chryse plus Apollo’s favorable wind (1.458–83) as a reworking of the Aulis sacrifice and departure.
- The paper argues that the divergences are meaningful: Chryses’ joyful reunion with his daughter and the orderly sacrifice contrast with Agamemnon’s attempted filicide, so the *Iliad* begins by distancing itself from human sacrifice and modeling proper ritual conduct.
- The allusive pattern is said to enrich characterization, especially Agamemnon’s repeated hubris and his fraught relations with Calchas and Achilles, and to map the start of the Trojan War onto the start of the poem, complementing other opening allusions such as Zeus’s plan and Helen’s abduction.
Methods
- The study is a literary and philological argument that combines neoanalysis with traditional referentiality, focusing on reworked narrative motifs rather than a fixed written source.
- It reconstructs the Iphigenia fabula from the *Cypria*, Hesiodic *Catalogue of Women*, Stesichorus, Attic tragedy, later literature, art, and scholia, then compares that sequence with a close reading of *Iliad* 1.
- The main analysis traces the six motifs in order and summarizes the parallel sequences in Tables 1 and 2; no empirical sample or statistical analysis is used.
Limitations
- Stated: the paper acknowledges that there is no direct access to pre-Homeric tradition, that post-Homeric sources may reflect Homeric influence or later developments, and that certainty about the reconstructed fabula is impossible.
- Stated: it concedes that individual correspondences may be more convincing than others, though it argues that the accumulation and shared sequence make the overall connection difficult to deny.
- Evident from the text: the argument depends on inferred audience recognition and on a reconstructed oral tradition; some parallels rely on later sources, and the claim that the Iphigenia story was known to the Homeric tradition cannot be independently proven from the *Iliad* itself.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
132 Own interpretation · 66 Sources not found · 16 No basis given · 8 Not checked yet · 7 Own result · 6 No full text of the sources
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is true that the Iliad lacks any direct mention of Iphigenia”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, the vast majority of the noun's Iliadic instantiations have this precise sense of a “boast” or “vaunt.””
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“the evidence of both art and literature suggests that it was only in the later sixth century that the Homeric poems began to dominate tradition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > I. THE FABULA OF IPHIGENIA
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“With appropriate caution, we can thus employ post-Homeric evidence as our best available guide for potential pre-Homeric traditions.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > I. THE FABULA OF IPHIGENIA
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marks 2003: 223 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The sacrifice of Iphigenia was an old and well-established element of the Trojan war tradition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > I. THE FABULA OF IPHIGENIA
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites arg.8 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites fr.23a.17-26M-W
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites fr.178 Davies-Finglass
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is the repeated conjunction of these motifs in the same sequence that would have produced a distinctive and recognizable Iphigenia narrative.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > I. THE FABULA OF IPHIGENIA
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this paper, I argue that the traditional narrative of Iphigenia's sacrifice lies allusively behind the opening scenes of the Iliad (1.8-487).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
In the paper
“The major difficulty here, however, is the fact that Odysseus's role is first explicitly attested only in fifth-century Attic tragedy”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [54] 54. ____. 2016. "Modes of Intertextuality in Homer and Bosnian Epic." In Gallo, F. ed. Omero: Quaestiones disputatae. Milan: Biblioteca ambrosiana. 123-45.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Even this Euripidean exception thus seems to presuppose and allude to Odysseus's involvement.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eur.IA 1362
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“But in later tradition, this role is almost always assigned to Odysseus.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eur.IT 24-25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Soph.Iphigenia fr.305 TrGF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 95
- Probably not a substantial claim. 135
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In addition, he is involved in many other missions that require cunning or deception, such as the Doloneia (Il.10), his infiltration of Troy in disguise (Od.4.240-58; Il.Parv.arg.4b-d GEF) and the theft of the Palladium (Il.Parv.arg.4e GEF).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Il.10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Od.4.240-58
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Il.Parv.arg.4b-d GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In the embassy of Iliad 9, he emerges as the clear leader of the group: although Nestor had asked Phoenix to take the lead (ἡγησάσθω, 9.168), it is Odysseus who”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 9.168
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 9.192
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 9.657
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“As punishment, the god inflicts a plague on the Achaeans, disrupting the war effort and causing much suffering (1.43-52).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.43-52
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In addition, he gloatingly describes how Chryseis will share his bed in Argos (1.29-31), a malicious boast that Aristarchus even athetized as”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.29-31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Σ A Il. 1.29-31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The Iliad begins with Agamemnon angering Apollo by dishonoring his priest Chryses, refusing to return his captive daughter Chryseis in exchange for an abundant ransom (1.8-42).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.8-42
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Chryseis's name is a patronymic, while her double description as a κούρη (1.98, 111) foregrounds her status as a daughter (cf.Dué 2002: 52-55 for the noun's traditional resonance).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.98
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1.111
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Later in the poem Briseis herself recalls how Patroclus had promised to make her Achilles' “wedded wife” (κουριδίην ἄλοχον) back in Phthia (19.297-99)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He responds angrily (ὑπόδρα ἰδών, 1.148), 104 complaining of Agamemnon's hubristic behavior (ὕβριν, 1.203; ὑπεροπλίῃσι, 1.205; λωβήσαιο, 1.232;”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He also verges once more on violence: without Athena's intervention, he would have drawn his sword against the king (1.188-94, 205) and he still ends the conversation by threatening to spill Agamemnon's blood”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a rare formulaic phrase, found only twice elsewhere in archaic Greek epic of Penelope (Od. 23.232) and Mestra (Hes. fr. 43a.20”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This is his only direct appearance in the Iliadic narrative, and he is only otherwise mentioned twice elsewhere: in Iliad 2 when Odysseus recalls his interpretation of the snake omen at Aulis (2.299-332) and again in Iliad 13 when Poseidon adopts his form as a mortal disguise (13.43-45).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 2.299-332
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 13.43-45
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“After nine days of Greek suffering, the Iliad continues with an assembly initiated by Achilles, who proposes that they ask a prophet about the cause of Apollo's anger (1.53-67).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.53-67
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other moments in the poem, by contrast, do in fact hint at the sincerity of Achilles' feelings for Briseis: after losing her in book 1, the hero withdraws from his companions in tears and sits on the shore of the sea (1.348-50), a pose that the scholia recognize as that of a distraught lover.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Iliad 9, the hero tells Odysseus that he loves Briseis from the depths of his heart (ἐγὼ τὴν | ἐκ θυμοῦ φίλεον, 9.342-43) and earlier in his speech he even equates her to Helen as his own ἄλοχον θυμαρέα (“darling wife,” 9.336).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In response, the seer Calchas-after seeking reassurance and protection from Achilles-reveals that Apollo is angry with Agamemnon for his mistreatment of Chryses and will not relent until Chryseis is returned with a full hecatomb (1.68-100).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.68-100
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Agamemnon reacts furiously, rebuking Calchas, but ultimately agrees to follow his instructions (1.101-17).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.101-17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, in the case of Chryseis and Briseis, the two are already close doublets of each other: besides their onomastic similarity (each formed as a patronymic adjective), both are war-prizes of prominent Greek warriors, captured in Achilles' sack of Thebe and Lyrnessus (1.366-69, 2.688-93), and both are described with a similar array of epithets, especially καλλιπάρῃον (“fair-cheeked,” Chryseis:”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On their arrival, they drag the boat onto the shore, set props beneath it and immediately disperse (1.484-87).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet this only makes it all the more striking that Homer devotes so much attention to it here, with the Iliad's only proper account of seafaring (1.479-83)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, the ensuing sacrifice diverges significantly from that at Aulis: Chryseis is not sacrificed to the god (or supernaturally saved).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The day after the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from Apollo and set sail back to the Greek camp (1.477-83).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is notable that this is the longest description of sacrifice in the whole of the Iliad, with a detailed description of the ritual procedure (1.458-61)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, Agamemnon's complaint against Calchas at 1.105-8 stresses this continuity (esp.αἰεί, “always,” 1.107); and Agamemnon goes on in the next line to emphasize the parallel between Calchas's past and present conduct: the seer is behaving in the same way “now too” (καὶ νῦν, 1.109).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, the poem makes no explicit statement that the plague has ended, despite it being the embassy's primary objective-an absence that seems to have troubled ancient commentators.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the enjambement in line 447 positions the “dear daughter” (παῖδα φίλην) and the “hecatomb” (ἱερὴν ἑκατόμβην) in close proximity to one another, reinforcing the speed (ὦκα) with which the sacrifice is begun.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, this whole verse only appears once elsewhere in archaic epic, in the description of the sacrifice that precedes the Catalogue of Ships (1.459 = 2.422), an episode that itself resonates strongly with the gathering of the host at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
boostedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But it is perhaps significant that we begin in verse 459 with a string of verbs that lack a direct object, which has to be supplied by the larger context.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“both the debate over Chryseis and her eventual return to her father replay and rework the sacrifice story.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
In the paper
“Among archaic lyricists, it was treated by Stesichorus in his Oresteia (fr.178 Davies-Finglass) and perhaps also by Simonides.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > I. THE FABULA OF IPHIGENIA
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites fr.178 Davies-Finglass
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This detail of the storm is attested elsewhere as early as Hesiod's Works and Days, where the Greeks are said to have gathered a large army together at Aulis, waiting for a χειμών to pass”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished Agamemnon's transgression
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Op. 651-52
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites fr.204.124-29M-W
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Once she has been collected, Iphigenia is delivered to her father in Aulis and placed on the altar, the consistent site of her sacrifice throughout tradition in both literature and art.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] 60. Debiasi, A. 2013. "POxy XXX 2513: Ifigenia nei Korinthiaká di Eumelo." ZPE 184: 21-36.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This version is already found in the Cypria (deer substitution and conveyance to Tauris: arg.8 GEF), the Hesiodic Catalogue (replacement by an eidōlon and immortalization as”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites arg.8 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites fr.23a.17-26M-W
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites fr.178 Davies-Finglass
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This detail remained a permanent fixture of the Iphigenia story: it appears in many other literary sources, 39 and is also reflected in the prominent position which the seer plays in the iconographic tradition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Aesch.Ag. 198-204
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Eur.IT 16-24
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hyg.Fab.98
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“it is plausible that he would have reacted with an impulsive outburst of anger.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hyg.Fab.98
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Aesch.Ag. 204
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Soph.El. 575
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Agamemnon's actions not only deprive Achilles of a potential bride, but also frustrate and anger him.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eur.IA 899
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Eur.IA 961
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lycoph.Alex. 190
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From an early date, the sacrifice story contained a number of core and stable elements that would have been integral to any telling.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
In the paper
“But this unique variant is most likely a pointed departure from earlier tradition, designed to downplay Agamemnon's individual imprudence and accentuate his role as a victim within the larger Oresteia narrative.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Aesch.Ag. 186
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Proclus again does not specify who performs the sacrifice: the Greeks in general simply”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites arg.8 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“It is thus likely that Artemis's punishment not only frustrated the progress of the Greeks' mission, but also inflicted physical hardship upon them.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished Agamemnon's transgression
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Aesch.Ag. 188-98
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Dictys 1.19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the opening scenes of the Iliad evoke the Iphigenia story as a parallel and foil, a carefully curated sequence for audiences to recognize.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
In the paper
“told them about the wrath of the goddess and instructed them to sacrifice Iphigenia to Artemis”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites arg.8 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In many tellings of the story, however, Iphigenia is not actually sacrificed: she is replaced (usually by a deer) and instead whisked away to become immortalized or appointed as a priestess in Tauris.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] 62. Draper, P. A. 2002. Iliad, Book 1: Homer. With Notes and Vocabulary. Ann Arbor: University Press of Michigan.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“but in later tradition, it is almost always Agamemnon himself who performs the sacrifice, with Calchas assisting in the preliminary rituals.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] 61. Dowden, K. 1989. Death and the Maiden: Girls' Initiation Rites in Greek Mythology. London: Routledge. ____. 1996. "Homer's Sense of Text." JHS 116: 47-61. ____. 2008. "Diktys of Crete (49)." In Worthington, I. ed. Brill's New Jacoby. Consulted online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a49. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“according to Proclus (Cypr.arg.4-5 GEF), Menelaus, Nestor and Palamedes went to recruit Odysseus in the Cypria, 56 while Apollodorus later reports that Agamemnon sent a herald to recruit each king (Epit.3.6).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cypr.arg.4-5 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Epit.3.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But his emphasis on Calchas's repeated behavior presupposes a broader history of bad blood between the pair (note especially the string of temporal adverbs: οὐ πώ ποτε,”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“After all, similarsounding names of royal siblings are paralleled elsewhere in early Greek epic by three of Metaneira's daughters in the Homeric Hymn to Demeter (Callidice, Clisidice and Callithoe, 109-10); such duplications were evidently not offensive to an ancient ear.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Homeric Hymn to Demeter 109-10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Undoubtedly, the Cypria's additional daughter”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] 73. ____. 2016. "On the Eve of Epic: Did the Chryses Episode in Iliad 1 Begin Its Life as a Separate Homeric Hymn?" In Kliger, I. and Maslov, B. eds. Persistent Forms: Explorations in Historical Poetics. New York: Fordham University Press. 397-428.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have already noted that the Iphigenia story is found in many other archaic texts, including the Cypria, the Hesiodic Catalogue and Stesichorus's Oresteia, which strongly implies that it was already firmly embedded in archaic mythological lore.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the independent existence of both Iphigenia and Iphianassa is in no way inconsistent with-and could even be presupposed by-Agamemnon's claim in book 9.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In these verses, the speaker calls on Artemis for protection from death (presumably on a sailing voyage: κακὰς δ᾿ ἀπὸ κῆρας ἄλαλκε, 13) 67 and recalls how Agamemnon dedicated a temple to her”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Theognidea 11-14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] 13. Armstrong, D. and Ratchford, E. A. 1985. "Iphigenia's Veil: Aeschylus, Agamemnon 228-48." BICS 32: 1-12. source
- Not checked yetcites [12] 12. ____. 2021. "Repetition or Recurrence? A Traditional Use for ἄνδρεσσι μελήσει in Archaic Greek Poetry." In Beck, D. ed. Repetition, Communication, and Meaning in the Ancient World. Leiden: Brill. 8-43.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we shall see, the Iliad mirrors the overarching Iphigenia sequence, but also reworks and distorts it at specific points-divergences that we shall consider further in section III.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Finally, Homer's direct avoidance of the myth fits with the Iliad's more general suppression of immortalization and killing within the family.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] 82. Foley, J. M. and Arft, J. 2015. "The Epic Cycle and Oral Tradition." In Fantuzzi and Tsagalis, eds. 78-95. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we shall see, all six elements are reflected in the same order in the opening phases of the poem.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > II. REPLAYING IPHIGENIA: THE RETURN OF CHRYSEIS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The audience of the Iliad would have been familiar with the Iphigenia fabula and able to recall it during the poem's opening.
In the paper
“The Odyssey is already familiar with Clytemnestra's adultery, suggesting that the whole family drama was well established at an early date.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] 80. Foley, H. P. 1982. "Marriage and Sacrifice in Euripides' Iphigenia in Aulis." Arethusa 15: 159- 80.
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This detail is not explicitly attested in any extant archaic source, but it fits well with Artemis's larger association with seafaring and seems to be reflected in one of the opening hymns of the Theognidea (11-14).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Theognidea 11-14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“And indeed, Agamemnon immediately follows his rebuke of Calchas in Iliad 1 with an unflattering assessment of his wife (1.112-15), hinting at the marital discord that arose from his daughter's sacrifice.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.112-15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The same unease may also be reflected in Chryses' pointed failure to appeal to Agamemnon's familial piety in his opening supplication (a common ploy in other supplication scenes: Il. 15. 659-66, 22.338-43, 24.485-87, 503-4; Od. 11.66-68).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Il. 15. 659-66
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 22.338-43
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 24.485-87
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ultimately, however, whether she is killed or whisked away, the attempted sacrifice always has a grim outcome for Agamemnon and his family: the loss of Iphigenia.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This whole episode closely parallels Agamemnon's offense against Artemis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like many scholars, therefore, I believe that the Iphigenia story belonged to the wider mass of traditions and tales against which the Iliad situated itself.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Not only does it play a key structural role-initiating the war with a sacrificed daughter, mirroring the sacrifice of Polyxena at its close 79 -but it also serves as a major motivation for Clytemnestra's later murder of her husband (cf.Pyth.11.22-23).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pyth.11.22-23
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In Iphigenia at Aulis, for example, Calchas specifies that Artemis has gladly received the sacrifice and”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1596-97
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1575-76
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Now that Iphigenia is dead (or whisked away to Tauris), it makes sense that Agamemnon only names his three surviving (or available) daughters as potential wives for Achilles (Il.9.144-48).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Il.9.144-48
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“After the sacrifice is complete, Proclus's summary of the Cypria continues by claiming that the Greeks”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites arg. 9 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Agamemnon impiously dismisses Apollo's divine authority, just as he had Artemis's at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the explicit Trojan war context, Aulis is the most likely setting for this dedication, 68 and the implication is that Artemis should protect the speaker's voyage just as she did Agamemnon's.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With Iphigenia's sacrifice in the background, Agamemnon's paternal love is not an effective thing to appeal to.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > Element Details (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sacrifice succeeded in appeasing Artemis, who quelled her angry storm winds.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, Achilles' claim that Agamemnon does not know how to look to the past or the future (Il.1.343) could be taken as an implicit gesture to his failure to learn from past mistakes.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Il.1.343
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After all the hardship and suffering that she has caused, the appeased god thus assists the Greeks in their voyage to the Trojan shore.Artemis transitions from obstructing the Greek cause to actively supporting it.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The king, it seems, has not learned from his previous transgression.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and he responds with similar venom.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This section of Iliad 1 exhibits the least direct mapping onto the Aulis episode, as it begins to turn our attention to the larger consequences of Agamemnon's conduct, especially Achilles' withdrawal, an event which determines the trajectory of the whole poem.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Iphigenia's key mythical role is determined by her status as Agamemnon's daughter.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, Chryseis and Iphigenia are similar figures, each primarily defined and identified through her relationship to her father.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These allusions to the two different Aulis episodes in consecutive books of the Iliad (the first implicit, the second explicit) could perhaps be taken to presuppose Homeric awareness of the Teuthranian expedition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the poem encourages us to see her as a potential future bride for Achilles, just as Iphigenia was at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Indeed, Apollo and Artemis appear to have been particularly suitable for this kind of revenge pattern.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] 89. Friedrich, R. 2002. "'Flaubertian Homer': The Phrase Juste in Homeric Diction." Arion 10: 1-13.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Achilles' loss of Briseis is thus analogous to his unfulfilled “marriage” to Iphigenia.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“though Achilles' later instruction that Agamemnon”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.127
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The repeated emphasis on Odysseus's central role at this moment (1.311, 430, 440) invites an audience to recall the last time he played a similar role.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, this resonant phrase is well chosen for Achilles' immediate addressee, Odysseus: Achilles implies that Briseis is his equivalent of Penelope.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both cases, the divinely induced impasse is explained by the seer Calchas, and the solution which he proposes involves Agamemnon giving up a prized woman from his possession-his war-slave Chryseis and his daughter Iphigenia.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and in context it too has its own rhetorical purpose: heightening the pain and emotion that Achilles feels at the loss of Patroclus.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“And he enacts an analogous punishment: the plague (νοῦσον ... κακήν, 1.10; λοιμός, 1.61; λοιγόν, 1.67, 97, 456) is a similarly violent upheaval of the natural world to Artemis's storm winds, causing anguish (ἄλγεα, 1.96, 110) and delay to the Greeks' project.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1.61
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1.67
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Indeed, as Achilles goes on to say, the Greeks are”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Il.1.59-61
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This line is most naturally understood to refer to a prayer or sacrifice which the Greeks have either omitted or wrongly performed.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kirk 1985: 60
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Pulleyn 2000: 143
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Draper 2002: 44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Achilles' reaction to Agamemnon's conduct also parallels that at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both cases, Agamemnon and the army take away what they had previously offered (cf. μ' ἀφέλεσθέ γε δόντες, 1.299).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There too, as we have seen, Odysseus appears to have been traditionally responsible for bringing Iphigenia to her father, just as he brings Chryseis to Chryses here.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Iphigenia at Aulis story, including Odysseus bringing Iphigenia to her father at the altar, was part of the traditional story world known to the Iliad's audiences.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the Iliad assembly scene may even nod to Agamemnon's original offense at Aulis when Achilles suggests possible reasons for Apollo's anger: he wonders whether Apollo”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But in this instance, the similarities extend beyond the typological norm, especially since the same mortal is at fault in each case.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaincorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Moreover, there is an underlying symmetry between this punishment and Agamemnon's previous crime: Apollo's punitive archery (1.48-52) echoes and inverts Agamemnon's foolhardy deer hunting.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.48-52
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet even so, here too the Iphigenia episode resonates meaningfully in the background, now centered on the figure of Briseis”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“But εὐχωλή, like its associated verb εὔχομαι, is a polyvalent noun which can refer to a “boast” as much as a “prayer.””
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Muellner 1976
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, Agamemnon may even subtly acknowledge this prior clash: he claims that “strife is always dear” to Achilles, alongside wars and battles (αἰεὶ γάρ τοι ἔρις τε φίλη πόλεμοί τε μάχαι τε, 1.177), a remark that-like his similarly phrased complaint about Calchas (1.107)-could nod to this specific past conflict.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The repetition of the hero's epithet πολύμητις (1.311, 440) may also foreground his capacity for cunning, inviting us to recall the Aulian marriage trick.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This parallel is particularly striking; on no other occasion in myth is Agamemnon required to give anything up to appease a god, let alone a prized woman.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But even this wish resonates pointedly with the Aulis episode (envisioning Briseis as a victim of Artemis just like Iphigenia)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Homer's initial emphasis on Apollo's descent from Leto (1.9, 1.36) even foregrounds this familial connection at the outset.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1.36
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these parallels thus establish the Iphigenia fabula as an underlying paradigm and foil for the Iliad's opening, inaugurating-as we shall now see-a whole series of narrative interconnections.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ultimately, Calchas goes on to dismiss Achilles' suggestion (1.93), but the raised possibility invites a further connection with the earlier episode.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here too, events map closely onto those at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the two offended deities form a natural brother-sister pair, reinforcing the correspondence between the two incidents-in both cases, Agamemnon offends a child of Leto.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
plaincorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Achilles loses a potential bride through Agamemnon's actions, just like at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like at Aulis, Agamemnon has “completely deceived and wronged” him (ἐκ γὰρ δή μ' ἀπάτησε καὶ ἤλιτεν, 9.375; cf.9.371, 375-76)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If Achilles had indeed been caught up in the crossfire of Agamemnon's scheming at Aulis, that prior history of fraught relations adds extra depth to their latest quarrel.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (C) Achilles loses a potential bride
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The consequences of Agamemnon's conduct are also parallel.Apollo grows angry, just like his sister (χολωθείς 1.9; χωόμενος 1.44; χωομένοιο 1.46; ἐχώσατο 1.64; μῆνιν 1.75; cf.μηνίσασα, Cypr.arg.8 GEF).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (A) Agamemnon offends a deity and is punished
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1.9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Cypr.arg.8 GEF
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Its presence here alongside ἑκατόμβη inevitably foregrounds the meaning of “prayer,” but Achilles' words may still hint at the possibility that Agamemnon's crime results, as before, from an arrogant boast.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we may also suspect that Agamemnon's outburst of fury against Calchas's revelation resembles his response at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (B) Calchas discloses divine displeasure and proposes a solution: Agamemnon must give up a prized woman from his possession
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken out of context, these verses could just as well refer to events at Aulis as those at Chryse.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“As Jonathan Burgess has demonstrated, “many transferred motifs concerning Achilles' death ... occur in extended narrative patterns,” reworking traditional sequences of narrative in order, a practice which he has plausibly grounded in archaic modes of performance.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Burgess
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, at a more thematic level, Agamemnon's “theft” of Briseis also parallels Paris's initial abduction of Helen, another major catalyst of strife.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ancient rhapsodes and performers appear to have picked up a story in sequence, a custom already reflected in the series of Demodocus's songs in Odyssey 8.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Agamemnon's critique of Calchas signposts the larger motif transference at work in book 1.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These lines are formulaic building blocks of the sacrifice type scene, familiar from many other iterations.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The proem's “plan of Zeus” seems to evoke and rework the foundational moment of the whole story: Zeus's “plan” to relieve the overburdened earth by destroying the race of heroes (familiar from the Cypria and Hesiodic Catalogue).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cypria
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hesiodic Catalogue
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, therefore, this Iphigenia pattern offers further insight into Homeric allusive practice.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here too, the sacrifice performs the same function; indeed, the whole ritual is designed to “appease” the god (cf.ἱλάσκοντο, 1.472).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are thus an apt pair to adapt and recalibrate different aspects of Iphigenia.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Iliad 1, then, Homer similarly exploits the story's introductory aspect, aligning the structure of his poem to that of the larger war.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He has clearly not learned from his past mistakes.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But given the sheer accumulation of parallels and the shared overarching sequence, the overall connection is difficult to deny.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Such an initiatory resonance also seems to be presupposed by Hesiod's mention of Aulis as the starting point of both his own voyage and that of the Achaeans in the Works and Days (650-53: see § I (A) above)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hesiod
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The parallel motifs are not only grounded in continuity, however.There is also significant divergence, especially between the fathers Agamemnon and Chryses.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, the favorable wind here is far more incidental to the immediate plot than it was at Aulis, where fair weather was the main goal of the ritual.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but here we can note how the tragic frisson of the Iphigenia episode is evoked but negated.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The immediate transition from Chryseis's return to the sacrifice mirrors the same sequence at Aulis, where Iphigenia's arrival immediately precipitates her sacrifice.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The debate over Chryseis and her eventual return to her father replay and rework Iphigenia's sacrifice through a sustained sequence of narrative connections.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Lucretius begins De rerum natura with a description of the sacrifice (1.82-101)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lucretius
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chryses' prominent role in the sacrifice matches that of the paternal Agamemnon and priestly Calchas at Aulis”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Agamemnon, in particular, repeats the same hubristic actions as before, angering both a god and Achilles.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, later descriptions of events at Aulis emphasize the misery of this moment: in Iphigenia at Aulis, for example, Agamemnon cries at his daughter's arrival (650, 683-84) and later groans aloud when he sees her led to the altar (ἀνεστέναξε, 1549), a foil to Chryses' joy here.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Iphigenia at Aulis
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the previous section, we have established an underlying symmetry between the events of Iliad 1 and the traditional Aulis story (summarized in Table 2).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Apollo's control of the winds in Iliad 1 thus departs significantly from his usual practice and aligns him even more closely with the appeased Artemis of Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“while Statius's Achilleid, which promises to lead Achilles through the “whole Trojan story” (tota ... Troia, 1.7), begins with the gathering of the Greeks at Aulis and may well have continued in book 2 with Iphigenia's sacrifice, as Alessandro Barchiesi has argued.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barchiesi 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We should note that the Iphigenia myth has a particularly inceptive aspect: the sacrifice is a key moment of beginning, initiating the expedition against Troy.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a strong sense of déjà vu as events at Aulis are replayed on the Trojan shore.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More generally, Agamemnon's fraught relationships with both Calchas and Achilles also reverberate pointedly with their prior history.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such doubling is also apparent in the reworking of Iphigenia: she shares features in common with both Chryseis (a possession of Agamemnon) and Briseis (a potential bride of Achilles).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Elsewhere in the Iliad, both Diomedes and Ajax play the role of the absent Achilles, while both Patroclus and Achilles allusively reflect later events of Achilles' own life and death.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Louden 2006: 14-52
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Burgess 2009: esp.93-97 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, there are multiple important “beginnings” in the Trojan war story (including the Judgement of Paris and Paris's theft of Helen), but events at Aulis were crucial for the commencement of the war itself and later tradition certainly considered the sacrifice an important moment of beginning.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, it inaugurates a whole series of retrospective replays of tradition in the following books, initiating an ongoing allusive pattern.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By looking back to the sacrifice story, the start of the Iliad replays the start of the whole Trojan war.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The outcome of the sacrifice is thus the same as at Aulis: the offended deity is appeased and allows for smooth sailing.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But there may be more at stake here: the Iliad begins by implicitly distancing itself from this prior tradition of (attempted) filicide and barbaric human sacrifice.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At one level, the allusive background of Iphigenia's sacrifice adds further depth to the opening scenes of the Iliad, reinforcing the characterization of key protagonists by echoing and recalling their past behavior.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The larger structure of the whole expedition is mapped onto the narrow contours of our epic.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and the vagueness of πατρί and τήν could evoke Agamemnon and Iphigenia as much as Chryses and Chryseis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Iphigenia's tragic fate is defused and reframed in a more positive light.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The episode concludes at a moment of transition and new beginning.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As with the preceding reunion of father and daughter, there is once more a significant difference here: the (at least attempted) human sacrifice at Aulis is again defused, and we are instead presented with an archetype of orderly, civilized sacrifice”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These opening scenes are not an isolated occurrence, but rather a repeated-and repeatable-scenario.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, when we recall his own past losses as a parent, his maltreatment of Chryses appears even more heartless.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here too, the Iliad looks back to this inaugural moment and incorporates it into its own beginning, redirecting the god's “plan” to focus specifically on Achilles' wrath.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the sequence progresses in the Iliad, we have noted an increasing contrast between the pair, as Chryses' joyful reunion with his daughter serves as a foil to Agamemnon's past loss”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of Agamemnon and Chryses also highlights a further aspect of this parallel sequence: the prominence within it of allusive doublets, whereby one traditional character's role is split between two different figures.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This imprecision is not unique, but for audiences who have recognized the underlying Iphigenia pattern, the extra semantic space could invite them to recall Iphigenia's own similar treatment at Agamemnon's hands: the verb ἔσφαξαν (1.459), in particular, resonates with the language regularly used of Iphigenia's sacrifice from Hesiod onwards.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hesiod
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we noted above, this fits with the Iliad's general downplaying of human sacrifice and immortalization, reducing the supernatural elements of Iphigenia's story to a lingering shadow.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The elaborately described ritual at Chryse (1.458-74) becomes a programmatic archetype of proper, orderly sacrifice, a demonstration of how sacrifice should be done and indeed will be done in the remainder of the poem.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through its divergence from the Iphigenia story, the Iliad begins by underlining that it is not a tale of such perverted violence, but one which rather models proper ritual conduct for Homer's own audiences.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Perhaps this language was particularly associated with the Aulis episode in tradition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Against the shadow of tradition, Agamemnon emerges as a callous ruler.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such a lack of one-to-one mapping between the mythical fabula and the Iliad could perhaps be thought to undermine my overall argument for this allusive scheme, but such splitting of a single character's fabula can be readily paralleled in other cases of Homeric allusion.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Agamemnon of the Iphigenia fabula is replayed in the Iliad by both Agamemnon himself (abusing Calchas, losing a female possession) and Chryses (facing the loss of a daughter, performing the sacrifice).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here too, these events follow the general pattern of the Aulis fabula.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Iphigenia pattern of book 1 parallels this phenomenon, complementing the closing Iliadic prolepsis of Achilles' death with an opening analepsis of Iphigenia's sacrifice.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > III. THE ARCHITECTURE OF HOMERIC ALLUSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether or not this was the case, however, it is clear that the sacrifice not only has the same goal as Agamemnon's (removing the divinely induced λοιγός), but also leaves space for us to recall the original slaughter of Iphigenia.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This final element of the Chryseis story closes the replay of Iphigenia's fabula at a structurally significant moment, echoing the Greeks' first arrival in Troy.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (F) After the sacrifice, the Greeks receive a favorable wind from the offended deity and sail to Troy
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The altar is precisely where Iphigenia is delivered to Agamemnon (e.g., βωμῶ[ι], Hes.fr.23a.18 M-W)”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (D) Odysseus collects and brings this woman to her father by the altar
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hes.fr.23a.18 M-W
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while his prayer to Apollo explicitly asks the god to “ward off loathsome destruction from the Danaans” (Δαναοῖσιν ἀεικέα λοιγὸν ἄμυνον, 1.456), a very similar request to that which would have been made to Artemis at Aulis.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > (E) Sacrifice is performed at the altar
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But more than that, it also exhibits an alert self-awareness about its own place in that tradition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With these various inceptive allusions, Iliad 1 is thus thoroughly integrated into the broader analeptic replays of the poem's first half, evoking and embracing the wider tradition.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The start of the poem thus echoes and reworks multiple key “beginnings” of the larger story: Zeus's plan, the theft of Helen, and the sacrifice of Iphigenia.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a way, the Iliad is restarting the song of the Trojan War, and to do so most effectively, it both acknowledges and appropriates multiple other beginnings.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The start of the Iliad equally faces up to this challenge, but comes to a rather different solution: it legitimizes its opening by incorporating and reworking the war's earlier major starting points.”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“It was always a challenge to commence an epic poem because there were so many different starting points available-a challenge that is explicitly recognized in the Odyssey's instruction for its Muse to begin “from any point” (ἁμόθεν, Od. 1.10).”
§ Iphigenia in the Iliad and the Architecture of Homeric Allusion * > References
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Odyssey
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
The available post-Homeric sources reliably reflect pre-Homeric Iphigenia tradition rather than only post-Homeric developments or the influence of the Homeric poems.
“With appropriate caution, we can thus employ post-Homeric evidence as our best available guide for potential pre-Homeric traditions.”
“we can only make use of post-Homeric evidence and thus face the risk that our sources betray the influence of the Homeric texts themselves, or otherwise reflect post-Homeric developments in the myth.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The audience of the Iliad would have been familiar with the Iphigenia fabula and able to recall it during the poem's opening.
“His very presence here at the outset of the poem would encourage an audience to recall his major previous contribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Iphigenia at Aulis story, including Odysseus bringing Iphigenia to her father at the altar, was part of the traditional story world known to the Iliad's audiences.
“There too, as we have seen, Odysseus appears to have been traditionally responsible for bringing Iphigenia to her father, just as he brings Chryseis to Chryses here.”
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
Levi-Strauss, C. (1955) · The Journal of American Folklore · doi:10.2307/536768 · Cited by 1,195
Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry
Lowrie, M., & Hinds, S. (1999) · The Classical World · doi:10.2307/4352297 · Cited by 541
The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry
Ingalls, W. B., & Nagy, G. (1981) · Phoenix · doi:10.2307/1087661 · Cited by 538
Homer and the Heroic Tradition
Whitman, C. H. (1958) · Harvard University Press · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674862845 · Cited by 412
The Best of the Achaeans. Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry
Solmsen, F., & Nagy, G. (1981) · The American Journal of Philology · doi:10.2307/294156 · Cited by 411
Immanent Art. From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic
Zeyrek, D., & Foley, J. M. (1992) · Asian Folklore Studies · doi:10.2307/1178340 · Cited by 388
Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's Bellum Civile
Masters, J. (1992) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 387
The tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the epic cycle
Burgess, J. S. (2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0741 · Cited by 376
The Death and Afterlife of Achilles
Burgess, J. (2009) · Johns Hopkins University Press · doi:10.1353/book.3511 · Cited by 359
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- [19]19. ____. 2009. Entering the Agōn: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- [27]27. Bowie, A. M. 2019. Homer: Iliad Book III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [36]36. Cairns, D. L. ed. 2001a. Oxford Readings in Homer's Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- [39]39. Carpenter, T. H. 1994. "The Terrible Twins in Sixth-Century Attic Art." In Solomon, J. ed. Apollo: Origins and Influences. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 61-79.
- [41]41. Cèbe, J.-P. 1975. Varron, Satires ménippées: édition, traduction et commentaire. Vol. 3: Caprinum proelium-Endymiones. Rome: École française de Rome.
- [49]49. Collard, C. and Morwood, J. 2017. Euripides: Iphigenia at Aulis. Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. 2 vols. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
- [59]59. Davies, M. and Finglass, P. 2014. Stesichorus: The Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [62]62. Draper, P. A. 2002. Iliad, Book 1: Homer. With Notes and Vocabulary. Ann Arbor: University Press of Michigan.
- [67]67. ____. 1987. Homer: Poet of the Iliad. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- [73]73. ____. 2016. "On the Eve of Epic: Did the Chryses Episode in Iliad 1 Begin Its Life as a Separate Homeric Hymn?" In Kliger, I. and Maslov, B. eds. Persistent Forms: Explorations in Historical Poetics. New York: Fordham University Press. 397-428.
- [83]83. Ford, A. L. 1992. Homer: The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- [86]86. Fraenkel, E. 1950. Aeschylus: Agamemnon. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- [88]88. Frazer, J. G. 1921. Apollodorus: The Library. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- [99]99. Hainsworth, J. B. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 3: Books 9-12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [104]104. Heubeck, A. 1992. "Books XXIII-XXIV." In Russo, J., Fernández-Galiano, M. and Heubeck, A. eds. A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey. Vol. 3: Books XVII-XXIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 311-418.
- [116]116. Jensen, M. S. 2009. "Artemis in Homer." In Fischer-Hansen, T. and Poulsen, B. eds. From Artemis to Diana: The Goddess of Man and Beast. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. 51- 60.
- [127]127. Kirk, G. S. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 1: Books 1-4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [139]139. Latacz, J., Nünlist, R. and Stoevesandt, M. 2009. Homers Ilias Gesamtkommentar. Band I: Erster Gesang (Α). Faszikel 2: Kommentar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- [154]154. Mastronarde, D. J. 2002. Euripides: Medea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [159]159. Merkelbach, R. and West, M. L. 1967. Fragmenta Hesiodea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- [160]160. Miliett, P. 2007. "Isaac and Iphigeneia." European Judaism: A Journal for the New Europe 40: 116-31.
- [162]162. Monro, D. B. and Allen, T. W. 1920. Homeri Opera. Tomus I: Iliadis Libros I-XII Continens. Tomus II: Iliadis Libros XIII-XXIV Continens. 3 rd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- [163]163. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A. and Tsagalis, C. C. eds. 2012. Homeric Contexts: Neoanalysis and the Interpretation of Oral Poetry. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- [165]165. Mossman, J. 2011. Euripides: Medea, with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Aris & Phillips.
- [166]166. Most, G. W. 2018. Hesiod. 2 vols. 2 nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- [171]171. ____. Forthcoming b. "Talk and Text: The Pre-Alexandrian Footnote from Homer to Theodectes." In Kelly, A. and Spelman, H. L. eds. Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [174]174. Papaioannou, S. 2007. Redesigning Achilles: "Recycling" the Epic Cycle in the "Little Iliad" (Ovid, Metamorphoses 12.1-13.622). Berlin: De Gruyter.
- [175]175. Parker, L. P. E. 2016. Euripides: Iphigenia in Tauris. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- [180]180. Pulleyn, S. 2000. Homer: Iliad, Book I. Edited with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ____. 2019. Homer: Odyssey, Book I. Edited with an Introduction, Translation, Commentary, and Glossary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- [193]193. Richardson, N. J. 1974. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ____. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 6: Books 21-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [196]196. Robinson, D. 1990. "Homeric φίλος: Love of Life and Limbs, and Friendship with One's θυμός." In Craik, E. M. ed. Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 97-108.
- [202]202. ____. Forthcoming. Homer: Iliad Book I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- [206]206. Séchan, L. 1967. Études sur la tragédie grecque dans ses rapports avec la céramique. 2 nd edition. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.
- [215]215. Stephens, S. A. 2015. Callimachus: The Hymns. Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
- [228]228. West, M. L. 1978. Hesiod: Works & Days. Edited with Prolegomena and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- [233]233. ____. 2014. The Making of the Odyssey. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ballesteros, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198924623.003.0003
Ballesteros, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198924623.003.0010 · Cited by 1
Ballesteros, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198924623.003.0008
Abbreviations, Sigla, Editions
Ballesteros, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198924623.002.0006
Ballesteros, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198924623.003.0006
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, T. J.
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Thomas J.
- ORCID
- Nelson, Thomas J.
- Venue
- TAPA
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-101
- ISSN
- 2575-7180 (ISSN-L)
- 2575-7199
- OpenAlex
- W4224127446
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 194
- Citations by year
- 2024: 18
- FWCI
- 70.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- TAPA (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
- Apollo
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- Iphigenia, Iliad, Homeric allusion, Agamemnon, Calchas, Trojan War, Homeric epic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
