The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology and Its Discontents: On the Verge of the Posthuman
Abstract
Immediately marized coming war on terrorism as [their] theology versus [our] technology, suicide bomber against nuclear power.1 His statement missed point: is American theology. For Americans, it is not Christian God but that structures American sense of power and revenge, nation's abstract sense of well-being, its arrogant sense of superiority, and its righteous justification for global dominance. In introduction to Technological Visions, Marita Sturken and Douglas Thomas declare that popular imagination, is often synonymous with future, but it is more accurate to say that is synonymous with faith in future both in future as better world and as one in which United States bestrides globe as colossus.2 Technology has long been unacknowledged source of European and Euro-American superiority within modernity, and its underlying mythos always traffics in what James W. Carey once called secular religiosity.3 Lewis Mumford called American belief system mechano-idolatry as early as 1934; few years later he deemed it our mechano-centric religion. David F. Noble calls this ideology the religion of technology in work of same name that traces its European roots to doctrine that combines millenarianism, rationalism, and Christian redemption in writings of monks, explorers, inventors, and NASA scientists. If take into account functions of religion and not its rituals, it is not deity who insures American future but new technologies: smart bombs in Gulf War, Viagra and Prozac in pharmacy,…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But if one accepts Dinerstein's (2006) figuration of whiteness as seminal to the American technocultural mythos, then the characteristics of whiteness-organization, embodiment/ disembodiment, and enterprise (Dyer, 1997)-can be understood as the jouissance, or desires, of new media and information technologies as well.”
From Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures (2020) · cites this paper as Dinerstein (2006)
In the citing paper
“Dinerstein (2006) calls this out specifically, arguing that technology as an abstract concept functions as a white mythology and that technology is the unacknowledged source of European and Euro-American superiority within modernity (p.569).”
From Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures (2020) · cites this paper as Dinerstein (2006)
Citations
Cites
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics
Hayles, N. K. (1999) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 · Cited by 5,284
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001 · Cited by 2,449
Cited by
From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation
Brock, A. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732147 · Cited by 606
Critical technocultural discourse analysis
Brock, A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816677532 · Cited by 318
Brock, A. (2020) · doi:10.18574/9781479811908 · Cited by 239
LIFE ON THE WIRE: Deconstructing race on the Internet
Brock, A. (2009) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180802660628 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Dinerstein, J.
- Corresponding author
- Dinerstein, Joel
- Venue
- American Quarterly
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 569-595
- ISSN
- 0003-0678 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2064338257
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- posthumanism, religion and technology, secular religiosity, American exceptionalism, technological utopia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology and Its Discontents: On the Verge of the Posthuman. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/aq.2006.0056
- The paper
- Dinerstein, J. (2006). Technology and Its Discontents: On the Verge of the Posthuman. American Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.