Cited by 45Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting IssuesAfrican history and culture studiesAfrican Studies and Ethnography

Female genital cutting: cultural rights and rites of defiance in northern Tanzania

Open access
Winterbottom, Anna, Koomen, Jonneke, Burford, Gemma·2009·African Studies Review

Abstract

Abstract: This article reviews campaigns against female genital cutting (FGC) directed at Maasai communities in northern Tanzania. The authors argue that campaigns against FGC using educational, health, legal, and human rights–based approaches are at times ineffective and counterproductive when they frame the practice as a “tradition” rooted in a “primitive” and unchanging culture. We suggest that development interventions that do not address local contexts of FGC, including the complex politics and history of interventions designed to eradicate it, can in fact reify and reinscribe the practice as central to Maasai cultural identity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/arw.0.0142

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aang Serian. 2006a. Report on Study Visit and Training Course on FGM and HIV/AIDS: Tasaru Ntomonok Intiative, Narok, Kenya. Arusha, Tanzania Aang Serian. 2006b. Report on Progress and Aims ofNoonkodin Secondary School. Arusha, Tanzania. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.0.0142 Published online by Cambridge University Press
  2. James, Stanlie M. 2002. "Listening to Other(ed) Voices: Reflections around Female Genital Cutting." In Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing US Polemics, edited by Stanlie M.James and Claire C. Robertson, 87-113. Cham- paign: University of Illinois Press.
  3. Talle, Aud. 1999. "Pastoralists at the Border: Maasai Poverty and the Development Discourse in Tanzania." In The Poor Are Not Us: Pastoralism and Poverty in East- ern Africa, edited by David Anderson and Vigdis Broch-Due. Oxford: James Currey.
  4. Wolf, Eric. 1982. Europe and the Peoples without History. Berkeley: University of Cali- fornia Press. Notes

Cited by

Authors
Winterbottom, A., Koomen, J., & Burford, G.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
African Studies Review
Published
2009-04
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
47-71
ISSN
  • 0002-0206 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2462
OpenAlex
W2101827919
Cited by
45
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • African Studies Review (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
Keywords
female genital mutilation, Maasai, cultural rights, rites of passage, rights-based approach, tradition and modernity, cultural identity, development interventions, northern Tanzania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review