Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Africa Has Never Been “Traditional”: So Can We Make a General Case? A Response to the Articles

Guyer, Jane I.·2007·African Studies Review

Abstract

Marginal Gains (2204) has been described as a surprising and bold book. Since the articles in this collection, which take one or other of its arguments as points of departure, share certain similar qualities, they can be treated as a collective effort initiating new debate with non-African economic research and thinking. This article reviews the argument of the book, highlights the concept and phenomenon of ordinal ranking in both the book and the articles, and then uses the findings to begin an appreciative critique of the ideas of Michel Callon. Although Callon's approach intersects with that of Marginal Gains in many ways, the scalar ranking of people, and the use of rank to exclude and divert, finds more prominence in the book's approach, which also has more relevance for Europe than economists seem to have acknowledged so far. The article ends with a new instance of ordinal ranking, from Cameroon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/arw.2007.0095

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1353/arw.2007.0125 · DOI
  2. Maurer, 2005, Mutual Life, Limited: Islamic Banking, Alternative Currencies, Lateral Thinking
  3. Hibou, 2004, Privatizing the State
  4. Davidson, 1992, The Black Man's Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation State
  5. 10.1353/arw.2007.0092 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0308275X9801800201 · DOI
  7. 10.1353/arw.2007.0082 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Servet, 2005, Autour d'un livre: Marginal Gains, Politique Africaine, 99, 155
  9. 10.1080/03085140220123126 · DOI
  10. Guyer, 2004, Marginal Gains: Monetary Transactions in Atlantic Africa
  11. 10.1353/arw.2007.0122 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/524941 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1353/arw.2007.0109 · DOI
  14. 10.1353/arw.2007.0124 · DOI
  15. Ferguson, 1999, Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt
  16. 10.1353/arw.2007.0094 · DOI
  17. Kriger, 1999, Pride of Men: Ironworking in Nineteenth Century West-Central Africa
  18. Haugerud, 2005, Book Review, Marginal Gains. American Ethnologist, 32
  19. Tapscott, 2006, Portfolio
  20. Eglash, 2000, African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design
  21. Coussy, 2005, Autour d'un Livre: Marginal Gains, Politique Africaine, 99, 157
  22. Piot, 2007, Border Practices: Playing the US Diversity Lottery
  23. Callon, 2005, Why Virtualism Paves the Way to Political Impotence, Economic Sociology. European Electronic Newsletter, 6, 3
  24. 10.1353/arw.2007.0077 · DOI
  25. 10.1353/arw.2007.0079 · DOI
  26. Giddens, 1994, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, 56
  27. 10.1215/9780822387640 · DOI
  28. Callon, Economy of Qualities, Researchers in the Wild and the Rise of Technical
  29. Ralph, 2005, Review of Margin Gains, Africa Development, 30, 251
  30. 10.1353/arw.2007.0094 · DOI
  31. Latour, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern
  32. Hart, 2000, The Memory Bank. Money in an Unequal World

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guyer, J. I.
Venue
African Studies Review
Published
2007-09
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
183-202
ISSN
  • 0002-0206
  • 1555-2462
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review