The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cave Use Variability in Central Maluku, Eastern Indonesia
Abstract
This paper explores variability in cave use in central Maluku from initial settlement in the late Pleistocene to the ethnographic present. Significant variability exists. Historic and ethnographic accounts highlight cave use that is not often considered by archaeologists. Some uses may leave few archaeological signatures. Factors affecting different cave uses are examined, including environmental, social/cultural, and historical factors. The effects of immigrant population influences, such as the Austronesian immigration into and/or influence on central Maluku, are also important considerations. The possibility of multiple migrations of pre-Austronesians and various Austronesian groups, and the subsequent effects on cave use, are also discussed. Archaeological case studies include the Labarisi site (north Buru), the Hatusua site (southwest Seram), and several cave sites on the northern Leihitu Peninsula (Ambon).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“however, excavations and radiocarbon dates are limited, with the earliest calibrated dates for occupation of this island group no older than 7 ka (Latinis and Stark, 2005;Kealy et al., 2018).”
From Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul (2018) · cites this paper as Latinis and Stark, 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul
Kealy, S., Louys, J., & O'Connor, S. (2018) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.003 · Cited by 169
Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
Bird, M. I., Condie, S. A., O’Connor, S., O’Grady, D., Reepmeyer, C., Ulm, S., Zega, M., Saltré, F., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Latinis, D. K., & Stark, K.
- Venue
- Asian Perspectives
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-136
- ISSN
- 1535-8283
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review