Cited by 163Political Conflict and GovernancePeacebuilding and International SecurityPolitical Systems and Governance

Runaway State-Building

O'Dwyer, Conor·2006·Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/book.3259

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expert consensus is that Mečiar constituted a serious threat to undo democracy.

    “The expert consensus is that Me č iar constituted a serious threat to undo democracy (Deegan-Krause and Haughton 2009; Deegan-Krause 2006; O ' Dwyer 2006, and Leff 1996).”

    From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as O'Dwyer 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Dwyer, C.
Venue
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks
Published
2006
OpenAlex
W2343362223
Cited by
163
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.19
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
Keywords
state building, state formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review