Cited by 31Community Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation ScienceService-Learning and Community Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Piloting Interventions Within a Community-Based Participatory Research Framework: Lessons Learned From the Healthy Environments Partnership

Open access
Strong, Larkin L., Israel, Barbara A, Schulz, Amy J., Reyes, Angela, Rowe, Zachary, Weir, Sheryl S., Poe, Cecil·2009·Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

Abstract

Background: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships experience unique opportunities and dilemmas when implementing pilot interventions. Objectives: We describe challenges and opportunities associated with conducting a pilot intervention within a longstanding CBPR partnership, lessons learned for use of a participatory process to pilot community interventions, and recommendations to funders on mechanisms for funding pilot interventions to help address these challenges. Methods: We conducted key informant interviews and convened a group discussion with host organization leaders and project personnel. Lessons Learned: Findings highlight the opportunities and challenges related to needs and desires of community constituents and the ability of pilot interventions to meet those needs, and the importance of ongoing communication to address anticipated and unanticipated challenges that arise in the context of short-term pilot interventions in community settings. Conclusion: We suggest several funding mechanisms for supporting the implementation of larger scale interventions following promising pilot efforts in community settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/cpr.0.0094

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics Report 2002 12060957

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strong, L. L., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Reyes, A., Rowe, Z., Weir, S. S., & Poe, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Strong, Larkin L.
Venue
Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2009-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
327-334
ISSN
  • 1557-0541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-055X
OpenAlex
W2122797662
Cited by
31
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in community health partnerships (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R24MD001619)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Keywords
community-based participatory research, pilot intervention, research collaboration, community participation, financial mechanisms, implementation barriers, community needs
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Health Promotion, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Michigan, Pilot Projects, Program Evaluation, Community Networks, Social Marketing, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review