Cited by 162Visual Culture and Art TheoryArt, Technology, and CultureCybernetics and Technology in Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Premediation

Grusin, Richard A.·2004·Criticism

Abstract

Premediation Richard Grusin Remediation and Premediation In our 1999 book Remediation: Understanding New Media, Jay Bolter and I defined "remediation" as the double logic according to which media (particularly but not exclusively digital media) refashion prior media forms.1 In response to the question of what was new about digital media at the end of the twentieth century, we proposed that these media were new precisely because of the ways in which they refashioned older media. Specifically, we examined the ways in which such media as computer graphics, video games, virtual reality, and the World Wide Web define themselves by borrowing from, paying homage to, critiquing, and refashioning their predecessors, principally television, film, photography, and painting, but also print. Video and computer games, we argued, remediate film by styling themselves as "interactive movies," incorporating standard Hollywood cinematic techniques. Virtual reality remediates film as well as perspective painting. Digital photography remediates the analog photograph. The Web absorbs and refashions almost every previous visual and textual medium, including television, film, radio, and print. Furthermore, we argued that older media remediate newer ones within the same media economy. The traditional Hollywood cinema, for example, has responded to the challenge of digital media in a variety of different ways: by employing computer graphics in otherwise conventional films, by creating films entirely w…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/crt.2004.0030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • AI and memory

    Hoskins, A. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.16 · Cited by 64

    “…in media and communication studies that considers how media (images, templates, narratives) are used to ‘ premediate ’ (Brown and Hoskins 2010; Erll 2008; Grusin 2004, 2010; Hoskins and O ’ Loughlin 2009) what is to come, to help make the future plausible and thus more manageable and controllable.”

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Grusin, R. A.
Corresponding author
Grusin, Richard A.
Venue
Criticism
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2004
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
17-39
ISSN
  • 0011-1589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0342
OpenAlex
W4232689480
Cited by
162
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
18.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criticism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
premediation, remediation, digital media, media economics, media convergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Premediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/crt.2004.0030
The paper
Grusin, R. A. (2004). Premediation. Criticism. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0030