Self-Efficacy and Learning in Sorority and Fraternity Students
Abstract
Self-Efficacy and Learning in Sorority and Fraternity Students Jon G. Thompson Jr. (bio), Crystal D. Oberle (bio), and Jennifer L. Lilley (bio) Past research consistently reveals that self-efficacy, referring to one's perceived ability to obtain a desired outcome, in academic courses is linked to academic achievement and motivation in those courses (Coutinho & Neuman, 2008; Elias & MacDonald, 2007; Hoffman & Schraw, 2009; Klomegah, 2007; Lynch, 2008). In particular, high self-efficacy in courses is associated with high academic performance, and low self-efficacy in courses is associated with low academic performance. Yet, the relationship is confounded by the fact that some students report lower effort levels in difficult courses (Lynch). In these situations, students may adopt performance-avoidance goals, whereby they try to hide their feared lack of ability and intentionally sabotage themselves by not putting forth much effort to learn and succeed in these courses, with the idea that failing due to lack of effort is more personally acceptable than failing due to intellectual inadequacies (Hsieh, Sullivan, & Guerra, 2007). For students who rise above their fears and devote greater effort to learning, their efforts lead to greater self-efficacy and academic performance (Hoffman & Schraw; Shell & Husman, 2008). Regarding benefits of Greek-letter organization membership in these domains, several researchers (Saville & Johnson, 2007; Wilder, Hoyt, Surbeck, Wilder, & Carney, 1986…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some researchers found that affiliated students perform better academically than do non-affiliated students.
“Some fraternal organizations state that their mission includes helping their members achieve high academic marks, and some researchers have found that affiliated students perform better academically than do non-affiliated students (Thompson et al., 2011).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as Thompson et al., 2011
Other researchers found that affiliated students perform either at the same level or below the level of non-affiliated students.
“However, other researchers have found that affiliated students perform either at the same level or below the level of non-affiliated students (Thompson et al., 2011).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as Thompson et al., 2011
Cites
Measuring General Self-Efficacy: A Comparison of Three Measures Using Item Response Theory
Scherbaum, C. A., Cohen-Charash, Y., & Kern, M. J. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164406288171 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Year in College and Sorority Membership in Predicting Self-Esteem of a Sample of College Women
Saville, B. K., & Johnson, K. B. (2007) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.101.3.907-912 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shirley, Z. E. (2025) · University of North Texas Dissertation · doi:10.12794/metadc500187
- Authors
- Thompson, J. G., Oberle, C. D., & Lilley, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of College Student Development
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 749-753
- ISSN
- 1543-3382
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review