Parent–Student Communication About College and Freshman Grades in First-Generation and Non–First-Generation Students
Abstract
Parent–Student Communication About College and Freshman Grades in First-Generation and Non–First-Generation Students Julienne A. Palbusa (bio) and Mary Gauvain (bio) First-generation college students are students whose parents did not attend and finish college (Engle, 2007). These students enter college with less knowledge of college activities and expectations, and they have less social support at home regarding college issues during this transition relative to students whose parents went to college (Engle, 2007; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005). These experiences may affect the college success of first-generation students, which is borne out by research on their academic vulnerability. First-generation students are more likely to have lower first-semester grades and drop out in the first year of college compared to their non–first-generation peers (Ishitani, 2006; Riehl, 1994). First-generation students also report feeling less prepared for college and more fearful of failure than students whose parents went to college (Bui, 2002). These patterns underscore the need for research on factors that affect the academic success of first-generation college students. Prior research has found that students whose parents attended college begin college with more understanding of higher education than do first-generation students (Engle, 2007). Parents pass on knowledge along with advice and emotional support that help their children when they encounter new challenges, such as the transit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No differences between first- and continuing-generation students were observed in how frequently students and parents communicated about college.
“While no differences between firstand continuing-generation students were observed in how frequently students and parents communicated about college, first-generation students reported that these conversations were less helpful and of lower quality than continuing-generation students.”
From Daily Communication Between First-Year College Students and Their Parents: Associations With Perceived Relationship Positivity (2024) · cites this paper as Palbusa & Gauvain, 2017
First-generation students reported that conversations about college were less helpful and of lower quality than continuing-generation students.
“While no differences between firstand continuing-generation students were observed in how frequently students and parents communicated about college, first-generation students reported that these conversations were less helpful and of lower quality than continuing-generation students.”
From Daily Communication Between First-Year College Students and Their Parents: Associations With Perceived Relationship Positivity (2024) · cites this paper as Palbusa & Gauvain, 2017
Limited research suggests that first-generation college students find conversations with parents about college to be less helpful than continuing-generation students.
“and find conversations with parents about college to be less helpful than continuing-generation students (Palbusa & Gauvain, 2017)”
From Daily Communication Between First-Year College Students and Their Parents: Associations With Perceived Relationship Positivity (2024) · cites this paper as Palbusa & Gauvain, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Student Adaptation to College Survey: The Role of Self-Compassion in College Adjustment
Scott, H., & Donovan, E. (2021) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2325-7342.jn26.2.101 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Additionally, when looking at communication between first-generation college students and their parents about college, Palbusa and Gauvain (2017) found that first-generation college students found conversations with their parents less helpful and of poorer quality than students whose parents did…”
BackgroundDuckworth, J. C., Bumpus, M., Forsythe, K. M., Cooper, B. R., & Hill, L. G. (2024) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968241273308 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Palbusa, J. A., & Gauvain, M.
- ORCID
- Gauvain, Mary
- Venue
- Journal of College Student Development
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-112
- ISSN
- 0897-5264 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-3382
- OpenAlex
- W2581793822
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of college student development (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- first-generation college students, student-parent communication, transition to college, emotional support, instrumental support, academic vulnerability, college readiness, college success, first-year college students, social support, cultural capital, university dropout, fear of failure, parent-student relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review