The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California
Open accessAbstract
Much recent research on sexual minorities has used couples-based samples, which—by construction—provide no information on nonpartnered individuals. We present the first systematic empirical analysis of partnership and cohabitation among self-identified gay men and lesbians using two independent, large, population-wwbased data sources from California. These data indicate that 37%–46% of gay men and 51%–62% of lesbians aged 18–59 are in cohabiting partnerships (compared with 62% of heterosexual individuals in coresidential unions at comparable ages). Unlike previous research, we find that white and highly educated gay men and lesbians are more likely to be partnered, and we confirm that same-sex cohabiting partners in our data have demographic characteristics that are similar to California same-sex couples from Census 2000. We also present the first detailed analysis of officially registered domestic partnerships in California. We find that almost half of partnered lesbians are officially registered with the local or state government, while less than a quarter of partnered gay men are officially registered. We conclude with implications of our findings for couples-based research on gay men and lesbians, as well as recommendations for survey data collection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haas, A. P., Eliason, M., Mays, V. M., Mathy, R. M., Cochran, S. D., D'Augelli, A. R., Silverman, M. M., Fisher, P. W., Hughes, T., Rosario, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.534038 · Cited by 1,236
Gonzales, G., Przedworski, J., & Henning-Smith, C. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3432 · Cited by 420
Buchmueller, T., & Carpenter, C. S. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.160804 · Cited by 349
Self-citationCochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016501 · Cited by 293
National and state-specific health insurance disparities for adults in same-sex relationships
Gonzales, G., & Blewett, L. A. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301577 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, C., & Gates, G. J.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 573-590
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2057181112
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/dem.0.0014
- The paper
- Carpenter, C., & Gates, G. J. (2008). Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California. Demography. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.