Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: Report from a technical working group

Freedman, Vicki A., Crimmins, Eileen, Schoeni, Robert F., Spillman, Brenda C., Aykan, Hakan, Kramarow, Ellen, Land, Kenneth, Lubitz, James, Manton, Kenneth, Martin, Linda G., Shinberg, Diane, Waidmann, Timothy·2004·Demography

Abstract

In September 2002, a technical working group met to resolve previously published inconsistencies across national surveys in trends in activity limitations among the older population. The 12-person panel prepared estimates from five national data sets and investigated methodological sources of the inconsistencies among the population aged 70 and older from the early 1980s to 2001. Although the evidence was mixed for the 1980s and it is difficult to pinpoint when in the 1990s the decline began, during the mid- and late 1990s, the panel found consistent declines on the order of 1%–2.5% per year for two commonly used measures in the disability literature: difficulty with daily activities and help with daily activities. Mixed evidence was found for a third measure: the use of help or equipment with daily activities. The panel also found agreement across surveys that the proportion of older persons who receive help with bathing has declined at the same time as the proportion who use only equipment (but not personal care) to bathe has increased. In comparing findings across surveys, the panel found that the period, definition of disability, treatment of the institutionalized population, and age standardizing of results were important to consider. The implications of the findings for policy, national survey efforts, and further research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/dem.2004.0022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Declines in instrumental activities of daily living disability, which may be more affected by the environment, have been more pervasive and occurred earlier than declines in activities of daily living disability, which are less environmentally affected.

    “For instance, the declines in disability characterized as instrumental activities of daily living disability, which may be more affected by the environment in which people live have been more pervasive and have occurred earlier than disability termed activities of daily living disability, which would be less environmentally affected (Freedman et al., 2004).”

    From Mortality and Morbidity Trends: Is There Compression of Morbidity? (2011) · cites this paper as Freedman et al., 2004

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Agree, 2000, Incorporating Assistive Devices Into Long Term Care Arrangements: Analysis of the Second Supplement on Aging, Journal of Aging and Health, 12, 426, 10.1177/089826430001200307 · DOI
  2. Arias, 2003, Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Report
  3. Crimmins, 1997, Further Evidence on Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Incidence of Disability Among Older Americans From Two Sources: The LSOA and the NHIS, Journals of Gerontology, 52B, S59, 10.1093/geronb/52B.2.S59 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Freedman, 2000, Implications of Asking ‘Ambiguous’ Difficulty Questions: An Analysis of the Second Wave of the Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old Study, Journals of Gerontology, 55B, S288, 10.1093/geronb/55.5.S288 · DOI
  5. Freedman, 2002, Recent Trends in Disability and Functioning Among Older Americans: A Critical Review of the Evidence, Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 3137, 10.1001/jama.288.24.3137 · DOI
  6. Gruenberg, 1977, The Failures of Success, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 55, 3, 10.2307/3349592 · DOI
  7. Jette, 1994, How Measurement Techniques Influence Estimates of Disability in Older Populations, Social Science and Medicine, 38, 937, 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90426-X · DOI
  8. Katz, 1970, Progress in Development of the Index of ADL, Gerontologist, 10, 20, 10.1093/geront/10.1_Part_1.20 · DOI
  9. Katz, 1963, Studies of Illness in the Aged: The Index of ADL, a Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychosocial Function, Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914, 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Liao, 2001, Recent Changes in the Health Status of the Older U.S. Population: Findings From the 1984 and 1994 Supplement on Aging, Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 49, 443, 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49089.x · DOI
  11. Manton, 1982, Changing Concepts of Morbidity and Mortality in the Elderly Population, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 60, 183, 10.2307/3349767 · DOI
  12. Manton, 2001, Changes in the Prevalence of Chronic Disability in the United States Black and Nonblack Population Above Age 65 From 1982 to 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 6354, 10.1073/pnas.111152298 · DOI
  13. Picavet, 1996, Comparing Survey Data on Functional Disability: The Impact of Some Methodological Differences, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 50, 86, 10.1136/jech.50.1.86 · DOI
  14. Pope, 1991, Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention
  15. Rodgers, 1997, A Comparative Analysis of ADL Questions in Surveys of Older People, Journals of Gerontology, 52B, S21, 10.1093/geronb/52B.Special_Issue.21 · DOI
  16. Schoeni, 2001, Persistent, Consistent, Widespread, and Robust? Another Look at Recent Trends in Old-Age Disability, Journals of Gerontology, 56B, S206, 10.1093/geronb/56.4.S206 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Spillman, 2004, Changes in Elderly Disability Rates and the Implications for Health Care Utilization and Cost, Milbank Memorial Quarterly, 82, 157, 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00305.x · DOI
  18. Verbrugge, 1990, The Iceberg of Disability, 55
  19. Waidmann, 2000, Disability Trends Among the Elderly and Implications for the Future, Journals of Gerontology, 55B, S298, 10.1093/geronb/55.5.S298 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Wiener, 1990, Measuring the Activities of Daily Living: Comparisons Across National Surveys, Journals of Gerontology, 45B, S229, 10.1093/geronj/45.6.S229 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Freedman, V. A., Crimmins, E., Schoeni, R. F., Spillman, B. C., Aykan, H., Kramarow, E., Land, K., Lubitz, J., Manton, K., Martin, L. G., Shinberg, D., & Waidmann, T.
Venue
Demography
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
417-441
ISSN
  • 0070-3370
  • 1533-7790
Cited by
261
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review