The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to identify the incentives and barriers to marriage among cohabiting women, especially disadvantaged mothers who are targets of welfare reform. We use the newly released cohabitation data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1979–2000), which tracks the partners of cohabiting women across survey waves. Our results support several conclusions. First, cohabiting unions are short-lived—about one-half end within one year, and over 90% end by the fifth year. Unlike most previous research, our results show that most cohabiting unions end by dissolution of the relationship rather than by marriage. Second, transitions to marriage are especially unlikely among poor women; less than one-third marry within five years. Cohabitation among poor women is more likely than that among nonpoor women to be a long-term alternative or substitute for traditional marriage. Third, our multinomial analysis of transitions from cohabitation into marriage or dissolution highlights the salience of economically disadvantaged family backgrounds, cohabitation and fertility histories, women’s economic resources, and partner characteristics. These results are interpreted in a policy environment that increasingly views marriage as an economic panacea for low-income women and their children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity
White, H. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912934 · Cited by 25,861
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Allison, P. (1984) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984195 · Cited by 2,150
Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories
Allison, P. D. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270718 · Cited by 2,096
Stansfield, R. G. (1983) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1983.42 · Cited by 1,917
The deinstitutionalization of American marriage
Cherlin, A. J. (2004) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x · Cited by 1,769
Demography, Measuring and Modeling Population Processes
Veron, J., Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2002) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1535065 · Cited by 1,709
Promises I can keep: why poor women put motherhood before marriage
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-3090 · Cited by 1,226
Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States
BUMPASS, L., & LU, H.-H. (2000) · Population Studies · doi:10.1080/713779060 · Cited by 1,220
Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage
Bergen, T. (2006) · The Oral History Review · doi:10.1525/ohr.2006.33.2.120 · Cited by 936
Cited by
Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000s
Cherlin, A. J. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x · Cited by 800
Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage
Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200104 · Cited by 616
Self-citationCohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. L. (2008) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2008.19.47 · Cited by 474
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 269
Brady, D., & Burroway, R. (2012) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-012-0094-z · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-240
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W1998528303
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 48.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/dem.2006.0016
- The paper
- Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.