The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage
Abstract
Interracial/interethnic marriage in America is a barometer of racial/ethnic relations and intergroup social distance. Using data from the 5-percent Public Use Microdata Sample of the 1990 and 2000 censuses, we interpret trends in intermarriage in light of new assimilation theory, recent changes in racial classification, and rapid demographic changes in American society. Our results indicate that changes in marital assimilation have taken on momentum of their own; that is, America's growing biracial population has fueled the growth of interracial marriages with whites. Analyses also shed new light on the effects of rapid immigration, rising cohabitation, and educational upgrading on intermarriage patterns, and yield both continuities and departures from the past. Historic patterns of racial/ethnic differences in intermarriage persist—Hispanics and American Indians are most likely to marry whites, followed closely by Asian Americans. African Americans are least likely to marry whites. Yet, the 1990s brought significant increases in intermarriage between blacks and whites; large increases in cohabitation did not offset the growth of racially-mixed marriages. The past decade also ushered in unprecedented declines in intermarriage with whites and large increases in marriage between native- and foreign-born co-ethnics among Hispanics and Asian Americans. The role of educational attainment in the out-marriage patterns of Hispanics and Asian Americans was also reinforced. Any evidence of differential growth in African American-white marriages among the highly educated African American population was weak. If intermarriage is our guide, any shifting, blurring, or crossing of racial/ethnic boundaries represent uncommonly weak mechanisms for breaking down existing racial barriers to black-white union formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
(1994) · Cited by 6,200
The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 · Cited by 5,059
Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure
Blau, P. M. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,792
Assimilation in American Life.
Tomasi, S., & Gordon, M. M. (1964) · International Migration Digest · doi:10.2307/3002902 · Cited by 2,672
Introduction to the Science of Sociology
Gault, R. H., Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1922) · Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology · doi:10.2307/1133512 · Cited by 2,514
Remaking the American mainstream: assimilation and contemporary immigration
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3746 · Cited by 2,468
Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration
Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2015) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674020115 · Cited by 2,133
Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends
Kalmijn, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395 · Cited by 2,121
Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations
Bruce, S., Schuman, H., Steeh, C., & Bobo, L. (1987) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/590918 · Cited by 1,919
Cited by
Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743 · Cited by 939
The changing racial and ethnic composition of the US population: Emerging American identities
Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00260.x · Cited by 302
Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters
Feliciano, C., Robnett, B., & Komaie, G. (2009) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.004 · Cited by 199
Charmaraman, L., Woo, M., Quach, A., & Erkut, S. (2014) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035437 · Cited by 171
Gender, Rural-Urban Inequality, and Intermarriage in China
Lui, L. (2016) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sow076 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-94
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2124800409
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 84.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240707200104
- The paper
- Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.