Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy

Arvin, Maile, Tuck, Eve, Morrill, Angie·2013·Feminist Formations

Abstract

The article explores two intertwined ideas: that the United States is a settler colonial nation-state and that settler colonialism has been and continues to be a gendered process. The article engages Native feminist theories to excavate the deep connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy, highlighting five central challenges that Native feminist theories pose to gender and women's studies. From problematizing settler colonialism and its intersections to questioning academic participation in Indigenous dispossession, responding to these challenges requires a significant departure from how gender and women's studies is regularly understood and taught. Too often, the consideration of Indigenous peoples remains rooted in understanding colonialism as an historical point in time away from which our society has progressed. Centering settler colonialism within gender and women's studies instead exposes the still-existing structure of settler colonialism and its powerful effects on Indigenous peoples and settlers. Taking as its audience practitioners of both "whitestream" and other feminisms and writing in conversation with a long history of Native feminist theorizing, the article offers critical suggestions for the meaningful engagement of Native feminisms. Overall, it aims to persuade readers that attending to the links between heteropatriarchy and settler colonialism is intellectually and politically imperative for all peoples living within settler colonial contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/ff.2013.0006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heteropatriarchy and heteropaternalism undermine and erase traditional Indigenous structures of government, kinship, and gender roles.

    “Heteropatriarchy and heteropaternalism undermine and erase traditional Indigenous structures of government, kinship, and gender roles (Arvin et al. 2013).”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Arvin et al. 2013

  • Everyone living in settler colonial contexts is both racialized and gendered.

    “Everyone living in settler colonial contexts is both racialized and gendered (Arvin et al. 2013).”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Arvin et al. 2013

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arvin, M., Tuck, E., & Morrill, A.
Venue
Feminist Formations
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2013-03
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
8-34
ISSN
2151-7371
Cited by
611
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review