The Greenest Building Is... One That Is Already Built
Abstract
The Greenest Building Is... One That Is Already Built Carl Elefante, FAIA (bio) In the five years since the Greenest Building article first appeared, a great deal has changed. While there has been significant progress integrating historic preservation into initiatives promoting green building and sustainable communities, unfortunately the most dramatic development has been unproductive and discouraging. The emerging culture change that I so hopefully pointed to in 2007 has devolved into the culture wars of 2012! First, the progress: In most quarters, the sustainability community is coming to recognize the importance of existing and historic buildings and to respect the expertise residing in the historic preservation field. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has contributed substantially to this "maturing" relationship. The Trust has engaged the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) to raise awareness of existing and historic buildings and to modify green building rating systems to more appropriately reflect their value. While this process is arguably still in its infancy, its significance should not be underestimated. The Trust co-sponsored with the National Center for Preservation Training and Technology (NCPTT) the Pocantico Symposium where five principles were articulated to recast historic preservation objectives in sustainability terms. And perhaps most importantly, the Trust's Preservation Green Lab published its groundbreaking study (The Greenest Build…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At the building scale, the primary means for achieving demand reduction is reusing the existing building stock through flexible space management, retrofits, and adaptive reuse.
“At the building scale, the primary means for achieving demand reduction is reusing the existing building stock through flexible space management, retrofits, and adaptive reuse (Elefante 2012;Frey et al. 2011;Hasik et al. 2019).”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Elefante 2012
These studies bear out the notion that the greenest building is one that is already built.
“These studies bear out the notion that”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Elefante 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teicher, H. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00836-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elefante, C.
- Corresponding author
- Elefante, Carl
- Venue
- Forum Journal
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-72
- ISSN
- 1536-1012 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-7296
- OpenAlex
- W1497642004
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 23.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forum journal (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
- Keywords
- historic preservation, sustainable construction, sustainable preservation, building reuse, energy retrofit, green building certification, National Trust for Historic Preservation, USGBC, sustainable communities, culture wars, climate change, energy efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review