Cited by 392Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

Trends in Media Use

Roberts, Donald F., Foehr, Ulla G.·2008·The Future of Children

Abstract

American youth are awash in media. They have television sets in their bedrooms, personal computers in their family rooms, and digital music players and cell phones in their backpacks. They spend more time with media than any single activity other than sleeping, with the average American eight- to eighteen-year-old reporting more than six hours of daily media use. The growing phenomenon of "media multitasking"—using several media concurrently—multiplies that figure to eight and a half hours of media exposure daily. Donald Roberts and Ulla Foehr examine how both media use and media exposure vary with demographic factors such as age, race and ethnicity, and household socioeconomic status, and with psychosocial variables such as academic performance and personal adjustment. They note that media exposure begins early, increases until children begin school, drops off briefly, then climbs again to peak at almost eight hours daily among eleven- and twelve-year-olds. Television and video exposure is particularly high among African American youth. Media exposure is negatively related to indicators of socioeconomic status, but that relationship may be diminishing. Media exposure is positively related to risk-taking behaviors and is negatively related to personal adjustment and school performance. Roberts and Foehr also review evidence pointing to the existence of a digital divide—variations in access to personal computers and allied technologies by socioeconomic status and by race and ethnicity. The authors also examine how the recent emergence of digital media such as personal computers, video game consoles, and portable music players, as well as the media multitasking phenomenon they facilitate, has increased young people's exposure to media messages while leaving media use time largely unchanged. Newer media, they point out, are not displacing older media but are being used in concert with them. The authors note which young people are more or less likely to use several media concurrently and which media are more or less likely to be paired with various other media. They argue that one implication of such media multitasking is the need to reconceptualize "media exposure."

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/foc.0.0000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 392

Authors
Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
The Future of Children
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2008-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
11-37
ISSN
  • 1054-8289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-1558
OpenAlex
W2162347890
Cited by
392
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 32
FWCI
110.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Future of Children (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
youth media use, media exposure, media multitasking, digital divide, socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, African American youth, television viewing, video games, personal computers, portable music players, risk-taking, academic performance, psychological adjustment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Mass Media, Microcomputers, Socioeconomic Factors, Television, Time Factors, United States, Video Games, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review