Transitions from high school to college
Abstract
The vast majority of high school students aspire to some kind of postsecondary education, yet far too many of them enter college without the basic content knowledge, skills, or habits of mind they need to succeed. Andrea Venezia and Laura Jaeger look at the state of college readiness among high school students, the effectiveness of programs in place to help them transition to college, and efforts to improve those transitions. Students are unprepared for postsecondary coursework for many reasons, the authors write, including differences between what high schools teach and what colleges expect, as well as large disparities between the instruction offered by high schools with high concentrations of students in poverty and that offered by high schools with more advantaged students. The authors also note the importance of noncurricular variables, such as peer influences, parental expectations, and conditions that encourage academic study. Interventions to improve college readiness offer a variety of services, from academic preparation and information about college and financial aid, to psychosocial and behavioral supports, to the development of habits of mind including organizational skills, anticipation, persistence, and resiliency. The authors also discuss more systemic programs, such as Middle College High Schools, and review efforts to allow high school students to take college classes (known as dual enrollment). Evaluations of the effectiveness of these efforts are limited, but the authors report that studies of precollege support programs generally show small impacts, while the more systemic programs show mixed results. Dual-enrollment programs show promise, but the evaluation designs may overstate the results. The Common Core State Standards, a voluntary set of goals and expectations in English and math adopted by most states, offer the potential to improve college and career readiness, the authors write. But that potential will be realized, they add, only if the standards are supplemented with the necessary professional development to enable educators to help all students meet academic college readiness standards, a focus on developing strong noncognitive knowledge and skills for all students, and the information and supports to help students prepare and select the most appropriate postsecondary institution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high proportion of students enter higher education institutions unprepared for the academic rigor of college or university courses.
“For example, a high proportion of students enter HEIs unprepared for the academic rigor of college or university courses (Bettinger & Long, 2005;Venezia & Jaeger, 2013).”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Venezia & Jaeger, 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stress, self-compassion, and well-being during the transition to college
Kroshus, E., Hawrilenko, M., & Browning, A. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113514 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Dougherty, K. J. (2024) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/01614681241240287 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Venezia, A., & Jaeger, L.
- Venue
- The Future of Children
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-136
- ISSN
- 1054-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-1558
- OpenAlex
- W2169557991
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 81.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Future of Children (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- college readiness, transition to college, dual enrollment, Common Core State Standards, college and career readiness, non-cognitive skills, habits of mind, student resilience, academic preparation, financial aid information, parental expectations, peer influence, achievement gap, low-income students, program evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Career Choice, Education, Educational Status, Forecasting, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Remedial Teaching, Student Dropouts, Training Support, United States, Vulnerable Populations, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review