Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Special Report: The Ethics of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety

Baily, Mary Ann, Bottrell, Melissa M., Lynn, Joanne, Jennings, Bruce·2006·Hastings Center Report

Abstract

The Ethics of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety Mary Ann Baily (bio), Melissa Bottrell (bio), Joanne Lynn (bio), and Bruce Jennings (bio) PROJECT PARTICIPANTS Organizational affiliations for identification purposes only; affiliations current as of 2006 George J. Agich, PhD Bowling Green State University Bowling Green, OH Mary Ann Baily, PhD The Hastings Center Garrison, NY Paul Batalden, MD Dartmouth Medical School Hanover, NH Nancy Berlinger, PhD, MDiv The Hastings Center Garrison, NY *Melissa Bottrell, MPH, PhD National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration Seattle, WA *Michael Carome, MD DHHS Office for Human Research Protections Rockville, MD David Casarett, MD, MA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion Philadelphia VA Medical Center Philadelphia, PA Janet Corrigan, PhD National Quality Forum Washington, DC Linda Cronenwett, PhD, RN, FAAN University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing Chapel Hill, NC Frank Davidoff, MD, MACP Institute for Healthcare Improvement Wethersfield, CT Nancy Neveloff Dubler, LLB Montefiore Medical Center Bronx, NY *Arnold Farley, PhD Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Baltimore, MD *J. Michael Fitzmaurice, PhD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD *Ellen Fox, MD National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC Brent James, MD, MSTAT Intermountain Institute for Health Care Delivery Research Salt Lake City, UT *Stephen F. Jencks, MD, MPH Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Baltimore, MD Bruce Jennings, MA Center for Humans and Nature New York, NY Robert J. Levine, MD Yale University New Haven, CT Joanne Lynn, MD, MA, MS The RAND Corporation Arlington, VA Karen Maschke, PhD The Hastings Center Garrison, NY Ethel Mitty, EdD, RN New York University College of Nursing New York, NY Robyn Y. Nishimi, PhD National Quality Forum Washington, DC Margaret O'Kane, MHA National Committee for Quality Assurance Washington, DC Paul Schyve, MD Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Oakbrook Terrace, IL Theodore Speroff, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN Sean Tunis, MD, MSc HealthTech San Francisco, CA Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH American Medical Association Institute for Ethics Chicago, IL *Note: The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in this report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The federal government employees listed above participated in the meeting discussions in an advisory capacity. However, in addition to the preceding disclaimer, it should be further emphasized that the statements in this report should not be construed as endorsement by the Department of Veterans Affairs or any other department of the U.S. government, nor do they represent the policies of any federal departments, agencies, or offiices. [End Page S2] Preface Powerful forces of change are at work within the American health care system. The public debate concerning health care financing and access to insurance coverage is intensifying. But below the surface of the media and policy debate about cost and access, a quieter but perhaps more significant process of change is under way: the transformation of health care management and delivery-indeed, health professional work itself-through health care quality improvement. The innovative, interdisciplinary quality improvement (QI) movement has begun to significantly upgrade delivery of health care in the United States. Taking its cue from reform approaches in other industries, and driven especially by studies indicating a shockingly widespread incidence of medical errors and a striking lack of consistency in the standard of care patients receive in different facilities and from different practitioners, the QI movement has arrived in health care. Using knowledge gained from the disciplines of medicine, nursing, health care management, and medical and health services research, it attempts to mobilize people within the health care system to work together in a systematic way to improve the care they provide. In this work, discipline-specific knowledge is combined with experiential learning and discovery to make improvements. Ethical issues arise in QI because attempts to improve the quality of care for some patients may sometimes inadvertently cause harm, or may benefit some at the expense of others, or may waste scarce health care resources. Ethical issues also arise because some activities aimed at...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hcr.2006.0054

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Baily, M. A., Bottrell, M. M., Lynn, J., & Jennings, B.
Venue
Hastings Center Report
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2006
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
S1-S40
ISSN
  • 0093-0334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-146X
OpenAlex
W2141962290
Cited by
185
References
2
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Special Report: The Ethics of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/hcr.2006.0054
The paper
Baily, M. A., Bottrell, M. M., Lynn, J., & Jennings, B. (2006). Special Report: The Ethics of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety. Hastings Center Report. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2006.0054

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.