Cited by 498Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in medical practice

An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics

Faden, Ruth R., Kass, Nancy E., Goodman, Steven N., Pronovost, Peter, Tunis, Sean, Beauchamp, Tom L.·2013·Hastings Center Report

Abstract

Calls are increasing for American health care to be organized as a learning health care system, defined by the Institute of Medicine as a health care system “in which knowledge generation is so embedded into the core of the practice of medicine that it is a natural outgrowth and product of the healthcare delivery process and leads to continual improvement in care.” We applaud this conception, and in this paper, we put forward a new ethics framework for it. No such framework has previously been articulated. The goals of our framework are twofold: to support the transformation to a learning health care system and to help ensure that learning activities carried out within such a system are conducted in an ethically acceptable fashion .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hast.134

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system.

    “Regarding the sharing of health care data, some believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system [90].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L.
Venue
Hastings Center Report
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
43
Issue
s1
Pages
S16-27
ISSN
  • 0093-0334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-146X
OpenAlex
W1984044747
Cited by
498
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 22
FWCI
42.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Hastings Center Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources (RC1RR028876)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
learning healthcare systems, research ethics, clinical ethics, ethics framework, embedded research
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Professional, Patient Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Judgment, Patients, Physicians, Quality of Health Care, Social Justice, United States, Personal Autonomy, Ethics, Clinical, Moral Obligations, Ethics, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review