The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language Interpreter Utilization in the Emergency Department Setting: A Clinical Review
Abstract
The emergency department (ED) serves as the entry point into the U.S. health care system for many patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). This paper reviews the literature on language interpreter utilization in the ED setting. We focused on three clinical issues related to professional language interpretation: (1) patient satisfaction, (2) health care delivery, and (3) current interpreter utilization practices. Compared with-English speaking patients, LEP patients report less satisfaction with medical encounters, have different rates of diagnostic testing, and receive less explanation and follow-up. Although professional interpretation has been associated with improvements in patient satisfaction, communication, and health care access, these services are largely under-utilized in ED settings. Reliance on untrained ad hoc interpreters, perceived time and labor associated with obtaining and working with an interpreter, and costs of implementing professional interpreter services serve as barriers to implementation and utilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use and Effectiveness of Interpreters in an Emergency Department
Baker, D. W. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530340047028 · Cited by 428
Cited by
Flores, G., Abreu, M., Barone, C. P., Bachur, R., & Lin, H. (2012) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.025 · Cited by 531
Fair, F., Raben, L., Watson, H., Vivilaki, V., van den Muijsenbergh, M., Soltani, H., & the ORAMMA team (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 · Cited by 312
Meghani, S. H., Polomano, R. C., Tait, R. C., Vallerand, A. H., Anderson, K. O., & Gallagher, R. M. (2012) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01289.x · Cited by 124
Ogunnaike, Y., Hyde, A., & Somanadhan, S. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100109 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramirez, D., Engel, K. G., & Tang, T. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 352-362
- ISSN
- 1049-2089 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-6869
- OpenAlex
- W2003936913
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language Interpreter Utilization in the Emergency Department Setting: A Clinical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/hpu.0.0019
- The paper
- Ramirez, D., Engel, K. G., & Tang, T. S. (2008). Language Interpreter Utilization in the Emergency Department Setting: A Clinical Review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.