Cited by 111Legal Education and Practice InnovationsChild and Adolescent HealthHomelessness and Social Issues

Pilot Study of Medical-Legal Partnership to Address Social and Legal Needs of Patients

Weintraub, Dana, Rodgers, Melissa A., Botcheva, Luba, Loeb, Anna, Knight, Rachael, Ortega, Karina, Heymach, Brooke, Sandel, Megan +1 more·2010·Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Abstract

UNLABELLED: As a preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of medical-legal partnership in pediatrics, we conducted a 36-month prospective cohort study of the impact of clinic- and hospital-based legal services. We hypothesized that integration of legal services into pediatric settings would increase families' awareness of and access to legal and social services, decrease barriers to health care for children, and improve child health. METHODS: Health care providers referred families with legal or social needs to the Peninsula Family Advocacy Program (FAP). RESULTS: Fifty four families completed both baseline and six-month follow-up assessments. Comparison of follow-up with baseline demonstrated significantly increased proportions of families who utilized food and income supports and significantly decreased proportions of families avoiding health care due to lack of health insurance or concerns about cost. Two-thirds of respondents reported improved child health and well-being. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adding an attorney to the medical team increases awareness of and access to social and legal services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hpu.0.0311

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weintraub, D., Rodgers, M. A., Botcheva, L., Loeb, A., Knight, R., Ortega, K., Heymach, B., Sandel, M., & Huffman, L.
Affiliations
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2010-05
Volume
21
Issue
2A
Pages
157-168
ISSN
  • 1049-2089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-6869
OpenAlex
W1492457459
Cited by
111
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
70.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
medical-legal partnerships, pediatric care, family advocacy, social determinants of health, legal services, social services, food aid, income support, health insurance, health care access, child health, barriers to care
MeSH terms
California, Child, Child Advocacy, Child Health Services, Child Welfare, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Insurance, Health, Interprofessional Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pediatrics, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation, Social Support, Lawyers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review