Cited by 512Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesPublic Health Policies and Education

Moving upstream: How interventions that address the social determinants of health can improve health and reduce disparities

Open access
Williams, David R., Costa, Manuela V., Odunlami, Adebola O., Mohammed, Selina A.·2008·Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Abstract

There is considerable scientific and policy interest in reducing socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare and health status. Currently, much of the policy focus around reducing health disparities has been geared toward improving access, coverage, quality, and the intensity of healthcare. However, health is more a function of lifestyles linked to living and working conditions than of healthcare. Accordingly, effective efforts to improve health and reduce gaps in health need to pay greater attention to addressing the social determinants of health within and outside of the healthcare system. This article highlights research evidence documenting that tackling the social determinants of health can lead to reductions in health disparities. It focuses both on interventions within the healthcare system that address some of the social determinants of health and on interventions in upstream factors such as housing, neighborhood conditions, and increased socioeconomic status that can lead to improvements in health. The studies reviewed highlight the importance of systematic evaluation of social and economic policies that might have health consequences and the need for policy makers, healthcare providers, and leaders across multiple sectors of society to apply currently available knowledge to improve the underlying conditions that impact the health of populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.phh.0000338382.36695.42

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assured equal access to health care opportunities is likely to have the greatest effects on lower income families, including many racial and ethnic minority families.

    “Perhaps the civil rights domain with the most obvious health consequences is assured equal access to health care opportunities-- likely to have greatest effects on lower income families, including many racial and ethnic minority families (Williams et al., 2008; Smedley, Stith & Nelson, 2002).”
  • Social determinants, including civil rights laws and their enforcement, affect health by affecting intermediate factors such as housing, employment, and transportation, which in turn affect the distribution of health risk and protective factors and the resources for prevention and treatment.

    “Social determinants, including civil rights laws and their enforcement, affect health by affecting intermediate factors such as housing, employment, and transportation which, in turn, affect the distribution of health risk and protective factors, such as pathogens and environmental toxins, and the resources for prevention and treatment (Hahn, 1995, Williams et al., 2008, Braveman and Gottlieb, 201”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Halpern D Mental Health and Built Environment London Taylor & Francis 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, D. R., Costa, M. V., Odunlami, A. O., & Mohammed, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2008-11
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
S8-S17
ISSN
1078-4659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025820027
Cited by
489
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01hl087322-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01-HL 087322, U-01 HL 87322-02, 3U01HL087322-02S1, R01HL069413)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059575, R01 MH 59575)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
social determinants of health, health disparities, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic status, housing conditions, neighborhood conditions, upstream interventions, health policy evaluation, health equity
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Social Class, United States, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review