The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More than Tuskegee: Understanding Mistrust about Research Participation
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes results of a qualitative study that explored barriers to research participation among African American adults. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify African American adults with and without previous research experience. A total of 11 focus groups were conducted. Groups ranged in size from 4-10 participants (N=70). Mistrust of the health care system emerged as a primary barrier to participation in medical research among participants in our study. Mistrust stems from historical events including the Tuskegee syphilis study and is reinforced by health system issues and discriminatory events that continue to this day. Mistrust was an important barrier expressed across all groups regardless of prior research participation or socioeconomic status. This study illustrates the multifaceted nature of mistrust, and suggests that mistrust remains an important barrier to research participation. Researchers should incorporate strategies to reduce mistrust and thereby increase participation among African Americans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5843 · Cited by 7,043
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893
Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care.
Gamble, V. N. (1997) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.87.11.1773 · Cited by 1,263
Campbell, L. C., Keefe, F. J., Scipio, C., McKee, D. C., Edwards, C. L., Herman, S. H., Johnson, L. E., Colvin, O. M., McBride, C. M., & Donatucci, C. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22355 · Cited by 169
Cited by
George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301706 · Cited by 1,603
Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland
Alsan, M., Garrick, O., & Graziani, G. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181446 · Cited by 676
Barriers to the Wider Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States: A Narrative Review
Mayer, K. H., Agwu, A., & Malebranche, D. (2020) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01295-0 · Cited by 426
Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications
Hasanzadeh, F., Josephson, C. B., Waters, G., Adedinsewo, D., Azizi, Z., & White, J. A. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01503-7 · Cited by 320
COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Beliefs among Black and Hispanic Americans
Kricorian, K., & Turner, K. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256122 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Scharff, D. P., Mathews, K. J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J., Martin, E., & Edwards, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 879-897
- ISSN
- 1049-2089 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-6869
- OpenAlex
- W2017946173
- Cited by
- 1,180
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More than Tuskegee: Understanding Mistrust about Research Participation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/hpu.0.0323
- The paper
- Scharff, D. P., Mathews, K. J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J., Martin, E., & Edwards, D. (2010). More than Tuskegee: Understanding Mistrust about Research Participation. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.