Cited by 6Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Response and ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

Examining Long-Term Mental Health in a Rural Community Post-Disaster: A Mixed Methods Approach

Ingram, Lucy Annang, Tinago, Chiwoneso B., Cai, Bo, Sanders, Louisiana Wright, Bevington, Tina, Wilson, Sacoby, Magruder, Kathryn M., Svendsen, Erik·2018·Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Abstract

Psychological stressors have been observed immediately following disasters, yet less is known about the long-term effects on the mental health of vulnerable communities. In 2005, Graniteville, S.C. was ravaged by a train derailment that leaked approximately 60 tons of chlorine gas and left several people dead in the small community. The purpose of this study was to examine the mental health of Graniteville-area residents in the nine years following the train disaster using a mixed methods approach. Using the photovoice method, participants reported compromised mental health with symptoms consistent with depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, fear, and anxiety. Medical records analysis indicated that mental health-related hospital encounters generally increased post-disaster. Mental health concerns should be anticipated in the long-term aftermath of disasters. Addressing these concerns is particularly vital in resource-poor communities. Our findings can be useful in developing mental health disaster management protocols and policies for communities in the long-term post-disaster period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hpu.2018.0020

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingram, L. A., Tinago, C. B., Cai, B., Sanders, L. W., Bevington, T., Wilson, S., Magruder, K. M., & Svendsen, E.
Venue
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2018
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
284-302
ISSN
  • 1049-2089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-6869
OpenAlex
W2788973202
Cited by
6
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
long-term mental health, disaster mental health, chlorine gas release, rural communities, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, fear, resource-poor communities, photovoice
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Disasters, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Railroads, Rural Population, South Carolina, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review