Women’s progress and women’s human rights
Abstract
Focusing primarily on CEDAW (The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women), this article examines the role that international human rights law plays in the advancement of the protection of human rights of women. My general conclusion will be that international human rights law is one small, but not utterly insignificant, aspect of the success of the women's movement, important more for its role in enabling the movement to grow and prosper than for what it does in and of itself. Indeed, I claim, human rights law lags well behind the women's movement in some crucial ways. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile that documents like CEDAW exist, and not merely for their direct legal value (which can be questioned). Documents help people to network across national boundaries and to develop a sense of common purpose, a common language, a common set of demands, and a sense that progress is being made; all of which are incredibly important for a movement, especially an international one, and especially for members who feel isolated or relatively powerless. In a few cases, moreover, CEDAW has had a real, if limited, legal significance, when implemented by friendly jurists. I suggest that the influence of international human rights law ought to be assessed, often at least, in this broader way, looking at the role of documents in political and social movements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CEDAW supported the international women's movements by providing common goals, a shared language, and a shared set of demands-all with limited but important legal implications.
“CEDAW supported the international women's movements by providing common goals, a shared language, and a shared set of demands-all with (limited but important) legal implications (Nussbaum 2016).”
According to Nussbaum's practical approach, it is the role that legal documents play in political and social movements that determines the effectiveness of international human rights law.
“According to Nussbaum's practical approach, it is the role that these legal documents play in political and social movements that determines the effectiveness of international human rights law (Nussbaum 2016).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Nussbaum, M. C.
- Corresponding author
- Nussbaum, Martha C.
- Venue
- Human Rights Quarterly
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-622
- ISSN
- 0275-0392 (ISSN-L)
- 1085-794X
- OpenAlex
- W2527466337
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Rights Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Keywords
- CEDAW, women's rights, international human rights law, women's movement, human rights treaties, social and political movements, transnational networking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review