Cited by 56International Human Rights and Reproductive LawFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesInternational Law and Human Rights

Women’s progress and women’s human rights

Nussbaum, Martha C.·2016·Human Rights Quarterly

Abstract

Focusing primarily on CEDAW (The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women), this article examines the role that international human rights law plays in the advancement of the protection of human rights of women. My general conclusion will be that international human rights law is one small, but not utterly insignificant, aspect of the success of the women's movement, important more for its role in enabling the movement to grow and prosper than for what it does in and of itself. Indeed, I claim, human rights law lags well behind the women's movement in some crucial ways. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile that documents like CEDAW exist, and not merely for their direct legal value (which can be questioned). Documents help people to network across national boundaries and to develop a sense of common purpose, a common language, a common set of demands, and a sense that progress is being made; all of which are incredibly important for a movement, especially an international one, and especially for members who feel isolated or relatively powerless. In a few cases, moreover, CEDAW has had a real, if limited, legal significance, when implemented by friendly jurists. I suggest that the influence of international human rights law ought to be assessed, often at least, in this broader way, looking at the role of documents in political and social movements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hrq.2016.0043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Nussbaum, M. C.
Corresponding author
Nussbaum, Martha C.
Venue
Human Rights Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2016
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
589-622
ISSN
  • 0275-0392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1085-794X
OpenAlex
W2527466337
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Rights Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
Keywords
CEDAW, women's rights, international human rights law, women's movement, human rights treaties, social and political movements, transnational networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review