The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining Disparities in Mathematics Education: Achievement Gap or Opportunity Gap?
Abstract
The so-called achievement gap in mathematics is reframed as a problem of unequal opportunities to learn experienced by many low-income students and many Latino and African American students. First, data are presented showing striking and persistent differences on standardized tests among students of different ethnic groups, and socioeconomic levels. Then evidence is presented demonstrating that opportunities to learn mathematics are not equally distributed among all students. Specifically, data show that African American, Latino, and low-income students are less likely to have access to experienced and qualified teachers, more likely to face low expectations, and less likely to receive equitable per student funding. The final section discusses how teachers and schools can provide more equitable opportunities to learn mathematics for all students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement
Jensen, A. (1969) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 · Cited by 2,907 · cited 2×
“…outside the school system to try to explain the differences in school achievement among various populations, such as differences in intelligence (Jensen, 1969; Bodmer & Cavalli-Sforza, 1973), poverty and deprivation (Guo, 1998), cultural disadvantage and deprivation (Carter, 1970), cultural and…”
Background
Cited by
Design Justice: towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice
Costanza-Chock, S. (2018) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2018.679 · Cited by 325
Re‐Establishing the Social‐Class Order: Restorative Reactions against High‐Achieving, Low‐SES Pupils
Batruch, A., Autin, F., & Butera, F. (2017) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12203 · Cited by 109
Brown, C. S., & Leaper, C. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5 · Cited by 99
Pope, L., Light, J., & Franklin, A. (2022) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00079 · Cited by 34
Why Am I in Reading Intervention? A Dual Analysis of Entry and Exit Criteria
Brooks, M. D., & Rodela, K. C. (2018) · The High School Journal · doi:10.1353/hsj.2018.0020 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, A.
- Venue
- The High School Journal
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-42
- ISSN
- 0018-1498 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-5157
- OpenAlex
- W1998882946
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining Disparities in Mathematics Education: Achievement Gap or Opportunity Gap? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/hsj.2007.0022
- The paper
- Flores, A. (2007). Examining Disparities in Mathematics Education: Achievement Gap or Opportunity Gap? The High School Journal. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2007.0022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.