Cited by 34Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityLanguage Development and DisordersVoice and Speech Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 97 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Black Children With Developmental Disabilities Receive Less Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention Than Their White Peers: Preliminary Evidence of Racial Disparities From a Secondary Data Analysis

Open access
Pope, Lauramarie, Light, Janice, Franklin, Amber·2022·American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

Purpose: Ensuring equitable access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention services for children with complex communication needs (CCN) is crucial. Evidence suggests that racial disparities exist in access to communication interventions, disadvantaging Black children. However, no research has investigated specifically the evidence for racial disparities in AAC services for children with developmental disabilities and CCN. Method: The current study applied post hoc data analysis methods within a preexisting, open-access data set to explore preliminary evidence of racial disparities in AAC intervention. Amount of AAC intervention was compared for Black versus white 1 preschool students at study initiation ( M age = 3;8 [years;months]) and 2 years later at study completion ( M age = 5;10). Results: Black preschool students were reported to receive significantly less AAC intervention per week as compared to their white peers, both at study initiation and 2 years later. By study end, 75% of the Black children were receiving less than 60 min of AAC intervention per week, an inadequate amount to achieve meaningful gains given their significant disabilities. Conclusions: It is unclear what mechanisms may contribute to the observed disparities; however, it is critical that concrete steps are taken by individual speech-language pathologists, school districts, preservice preparation programs, and researchers to identify inequities in AAC services and take actions to rectify them. Future research is essential to investigate the potential factors contributing to inequalities and determine effective interventions to address them.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This secondary analysis of an open-access longitudinal dataset found that Black preschool children with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs were reported by teachers to receive significantly less AAC intervention per week than their white peers, both at study initiation and two years later. By study completion, 75% of Black children received less than 60 min of AAC intervention per week, an amount the authors describe as inadequate for meaningful gains.

Key findings

  • Black children received significantly less teacher-reported AAC intervention per week than white children at study initiation (Mann–Whitney U = 305.0, p = .039, r = .23) and at study completion two years later (U = 205.5, p = .036, r = .26).
  • At study initiation, 63% of white children versus 29% of Black children were reported to receive 90+ min of AAC intervention per week; at study completion, 52% of white children versus 25% of Black children received 90+ min per week.
  • By study completion, 75% of Black children were receiving less than 60 min of AAC intervention per week, compared with 35% of white children; the authors cite evidence that at least 60 min per week is needed for meaningful gains for preschool children with complex communication needs.
  • The groups did not differ significantly at study initiation on age, language skills (MSEL, PLS, PPVT), child communicative acts, or adult input during home observations.

Methods

  • Post hoc secondary data analysis of the Brady (2016) open-access longitudinal dataset, originally collected from 93 children with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs enrolled in preschool programs in Topeka or Wichita, Kansas, in 2007.
  • Current sample included 78 children (14 Black, 64 white) with Black-or-white race data and AAC intervention time at study initiation; 66 children (12 Black, 54 white) had AAC intervention data at study completion approximately two years later. Mean age was 3;8 at initiation and 5;10 at completion.
  • The dependent variable was teacher-reported amount of direct AAC intervention per week, measured on a five-category ordinal scale (never, less than 30 min/week, 30–59 min/week, 60–89 min/week, 90+ min/week). Separate Mann–Whitney U tests compared Black versus white participants at study initiation and study completion.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the original data are dated (from 2007), the sample is small and unbalanced with few Black participants, the post hoc design was not intended to examine race, and the data lack family-, classroom-, provider-, and school-level variables that could mediate the observed disparity.
  • The paper also states that AAC intervention was measured only by teacher report on an ordinal scale, limiting precision and addressing quantity but not quality of intervention; analyses were underpowered, and only Black versus white comparisons were possible because other racial/ethnic categories were masked in the public dataset.
  • Evident from the text: causal mechanisms cannot be determined, and the small, geographically specific sample limits generalizability to the broader population of Black children with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00079

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 97 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 74 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 65
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
82 of 82
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No previous research has examined the evidence for racial disparities in AAC service delivery for children with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs.

    “However, no research has investigated specifically the evidence for racial disparities in AAC services for children with developmental disabilities and CCN.”
    “Given that no previous research has examined the evidence for racial disparities in AAC service delivery, post hoc methods are an appropriate place to start, as they allow for the initial exploration of a potential phenomenon, as well as the generation of hypotheses to be tested with more rigorous methods (Hollenbeck & Wright, 2017).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Teacher reports of the amount of AAC intervention per week accurately reflect the actual amount of AAC intervention children receive.

    “The dependent variable in the current study was the amount of AAC intervention per week, as measured via report from each participant's classroom teacher.”
    “Teachers were instructed to include any AAC intervention provided throughout the day (e.g., not just specific speech therapy sessions) in their estimations and to exclude group activities that were not directed specifically to the target child's AAC use (Brady et al., 2013).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participant race was accurately recorded in the original data set.

    “Participant race was recorded in the original data set but was not considered as a predictor of communication skills in the original study.”
    “The current study included all children from the Brady (2016) data set who met the following additional criteria: (a) had reported data on race indicating that they were either Black or white only”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reported amount of AAC intervention per week in the original data set accurately reflects the AAC services received by the children.

    “the evidence of statistically significant and sustained racial disparities in reported amount of AAC services for preschool children with developmental disabilities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The racial categories recorded in the original data set are valid and comparable across children.

    “The ratio of white children as compared to Black children in this sample is notably unbalanced, though this ratio does represent the demographics of Topeka and Wichita per the 2010 Census (U.S. Census Bureau, n.d.).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Research addressing racial disparities in speech-language pathology services is limited.

    “Research addressing racial disparities in speech-language pathology services is limited.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hayes-Greene, D. , & Love, B. P. (2018). The groundwater approach: Building a practical understanding of structural racism. The Racial Equity Institute.
  2. Lawrence K. & Keleher T. (2004 October). Structural racism. In Race and Public Policy Conference Berkeley CA United States. https://www.intergroupresources.com/rc/Definitions%20of%20Racism.pdf
  3. Rowland, C. , & Schweigert, M. (2003). Design to Learn Inventory. OHSU Design to Learn Projects.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Pope, L., Light, J., & Franklin, A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Miami University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2022-09-07
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
2159-2174
ISSN
  • 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9110
OpenAlex
W4294129103
Cited by
34
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
augmentative and alternative communication, racial disparities, Black children, developmental disabilities, complex communication needs, preschool children, speech-language pathology services
MeSH terms
Data Analysis, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Communication, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Communication Disorders, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review