Cited by 6Indigenous Cultures and HistoryHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesRace, History, and American Society

American Indian Women's Activism in the 1960s and 1970s

Hightower-Langston, Donna·2003·Hypatia

Abstract

This article will focus on the role of women in three red power events: the occupation of Alcatraz Island, the Fish-in movement, and the occupation at Wounded Knee. Men held most public roles at Alcatraz and Wounded Knee, even though women were the numerical majority at Wounded Knee. Female elders played a significant role at Wounded Knee, where the occupation was originally their idea. In contrast to these two occupations, the public leaders of the Fish-in movement were women—not an untraditional role for women of Northwest Coastal tribes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hyp.2003.0021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hightower-Langston, D.
Venue
Hypatia
Published
2003
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
114-132
ISSN
  • 0887-5367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-2001
OpenAlex
W4242581949
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypatia (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
American Indian women, Native American activism, Red Power movement, Alcatraz occupation, Wounded Knee occupation, women in leadership, 1960s-1970s

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review