Cited by 33Indian and Buddhist StudiesTravel Writing and LiteratureJapanese History and Culture

Seeking Sakyamuni: Travel and the Reconstruction of Japanese Buddhism

Jaffe, Richard M.·2004·The Journal of Japanese Studies

Abstract

The reconstruction of Japanese Buddhism in Meiji, Taisho, and Showa Japan involved not only interchanges with Europe and the United States. A central but overlooked catalyst for change was increased travel to and exchange with other Buddhists in Asia. An examination of travel accounts and other writings of three Meiji-era Japanese Buddhist travelers to South and Southeast Asia—Kitabatake Doryu, Shaku Kozen, and Shaku Soen—reveals how contact with Buddhists in those regions stimulated Japanese Buddhists to rethink the role of the historical Buddha in their tradition and demonstrates the importance of these contacts for Buddhism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jjs.2004.0019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diverse modern constructions of Buddhism involved a wide variety of Indians, Thais, Sri Lankans, Japanese, Koreans, Tibetans, and Chinese who listened and responded not only to what Europeans and Americans said about Buddhism, but who also talked among themselves.

    “involved a wide variety of Indians, Thais, Sri Lankans, Japanese, Koreans, Tibetans, and Chinese who listened and responded not only to what Europeans and Americans said about Buddhism, but who also talked among themselves . . . .”
  • Consideration of these exchanges in Asia reveals the emergence of a tightly linked global Buddhist culture in the late nineteenth century and illuminates the diverse 'complex global loops' through which ideas were transmitted.

    “Consideration of these exchanges in Asia reveals the emergence of a tightly linked global Buddhist culture in the late nineteenth century and illuminates the diverse 'complex global loops' through which ideas were transmitted. (Jaffe 2004, 67)”
  • Modern Buddhism was made and remade through a dizzying array of interactions and connections across Asia.

    “As Richard Jaffe has encouraged us to understand, modern Buddhism was made and remade through a dizzying array of interactions and connections across Asia.”
  • By the end of the nineteenth century, India was being re-discovered and reimagined as the birthplace of Buddhism and a necessary nexus for international Buddhist connections.

    “by the end of the nineteenth century, India was being re-discovered and reimagined as the birthplace of Buddhism and a necessary nexus for international Buddhist connections (Frasch 2013; Jaffe 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jaffe, R. M.
Corresponding author
Jaffe, Richard M.
Venue
The Journal of Japanese Studies
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2004-12
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
65-96
ISSN
  • 0095-6848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4721
OpenAlex
W2054330676
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Japanese Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Travel Writing and Literature
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
Keywords
Japanese Buddhism, Sakyamuni, historical Buddha, Buddhist travel, South and Southeast Asia, travel accounts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review