Cited by 62Income, Poverty, and InequalityPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

Poverty, Inequality, and Democracy (II): Does Electoral Democracy Boost Economic Equality?

Bermeo, Nancy·2009·Journal of Democracy

Abstract

Inequalities seem ubiquitous, despite the spread of electoral democracy and what were, until recently, positive rates of economic growth. These seemingly mismatched trends should not surprise us. The advance of democracy entails a decrease in political inequality but does not guarantee decreases in inequalities of other sorts. Economic (and other) inequalities have historically followed their own dynamic, independent of whether electoral democracy exists. The same generalization holds for electoral democracy and poverty. Collective action challenges mean that rising economic inequalities will not be easily reversed. This may harm the quality of contemporary democracies, but is unlikely to cause massive collapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jod.0.0112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns was more powerful in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.

    “subsequent research suggests that any effect of inequality on democratic transitions and breakdowns was more powerful in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries”

    From Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding (2018) · cites this paper as Bermeo 2009

  • The most likely reason democratic transitions took place amid high inequality is that international market forces largely constrained avowedly leftist governments from embarking on massive redistributive projects.

    “The most likely reason is that international market forces have largely constrained avowedly leftist governments from embarking on massive redistributive projects”

    From Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding (2018) · cites this paper as Bermeo 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bermeo, N.
Corresponding author
Bermeo, Nancy
Venue
Journal of Democracy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2009-10
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
21-35
ISSN
  • 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3214
OpenAlex
W2092951950
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
electoral democracy, economic inequality, poverty, political inequality, collective action, quality of democracy, economic growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review