Cited by 1,175Political Theory and DemocracyJudicial and Constitutional StudiesPolitical Conflict and Governance

Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies

O'Donnell, Guillermo A·1998·Journal of Democracy

Abstract

Journal of Democracy - Volume 9, Number 3, July 1998

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jod.1998.0051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Legal institutions function as effective checks against executive overreach through horizontal accountability.

    “O'Donnell (1998) highlights the importance of horizontal accountability, whereby legal institutions function as effective checks against executive overreach.”

    From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as O'Donnell (1998)

  • Legal instruments such as freedom of information laws and anti-corruption statutes enhance governmental accountability and public oversight.

    “Legal instruments such as freedom of information laws and anti-corruption statutes enhance governmental accountability and public oversight (O'Donnell, 1998 ; Fukuyama, 2014).”

    From The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance (2025) · cites this paper as O'Donnell, 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Donnell, G. A.
Corresponding author
O'Donnell, Guillermo A
Venue
Journal of Democracy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
1998-07
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
112-126
ISSN
  • 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3214
OpenAlex
W2093748330
Cited by
1,175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 50
FWCI
87.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
horizontal accountability, new democracies, political accountability, civil society, political parties, democratization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review