The Power of Protest
Abstract
Increasingly, the constitutional coup d'état has become the favored tactic for leaders and ruling parties to secure their grip on power by overturning limits on presidential terms. The threat to term limits seemingly indicate that democratization on the African continent has stalled or is reversing. Yet African populations have responded to these efforts by mobilizing en masse in order to voice their opposition and to defend their constitutions—in some cases facing violent crackdown by the police or military. Ultimately, there is hope from below as opposition leaders, social activists, and ordinary citizens demand that their leaders adhere to democratic institutions—suggesting that the democratization process across Africa continues even as term limits come under threat.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Refusing to vilify supporters of the polarizing incumbent, and countering the narrative rather than responding to personal insults or amplifying specific lies and disinformation, can help defuse the Us vs. Them binary fueled by deliberate provocation and disinformation.
“Refusing to vilify supporters of the polarizing incumbent, and countering the narrative rather than responding to personal insults or amplifying specific lies and disinformation can also help to defuse the Us vs. Them binary fueled by deliberate provocation and disinformation.”
From Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies
Somer, M., McCoy, J. L., & Luke, R. E. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1865316 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yarwood, J.
- Corresponding author
- Yarwood, Janette
- Venue
- Journal of Democracy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 51-60
- ISSN
- 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3214
- OpenAlex
- W2470150075
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- presidential term limits, democratization, mass mobilization, protest, African politics, opposition movements, social activism, democratic institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review