The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Signs of Deconsolidation
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, parties and candidates challenging key democratic norms have won unprecedented popular support in liberal democracies across the globe. Drawing on public opinion data from the World Values Survey and various national polls, we show that the success of anti-establishment parties and candidates is not a temporal or geographic aberration, but rather a reflection of growing popular disaffection with liberal-democratic norms and institutions, and of increasing support for authoritarian interpretations of democracy. The record number of anti-system politicians in office raises uncertainty about the strength of supposedly “consolidated” liberal democracies and highlights the need for further analysis of the signs of democratic deconsolidation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Müller, J.-W. (2016) · doi:10.9783/9780812293784 · Cited by 2,219
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0049 · Cited by 1,022
Self-citationToward Consolidated Democracies
Linz, J. J. (. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0031 · Cited by 955
Müller, J. (2016) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 593
Inglehart, R. (2016) · Journal of democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0053 · Cited by 113
Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989-1993
Szulkin, R., Ekiert, G., & Kublik, J. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2654364 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Political Trust in a Cynical Age
Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550 · Cited by 722
Poland's Constitutional Breakdown
Sadurski, W. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001 · Cited by 588
Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency
Carey, J. M., Helmke, G., Nyhan, B., Sanders, M., & Stokes, S. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s153759271900001x · Cited by 159
Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding
Jee, H., Lueders, H., & Myrick, R. (2022) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709 · Cited by 80
How Great is the Current Danger to Democracy? Assessing the Risk With Historical Data
Treisman, D. (2023) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140231168363 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Democracy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-15
- ISSN
- 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3214
- OpenAlex
- W2575122022
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 397.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Signs of Deconsolidation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/jod.2017.0000
- The paper
- Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The Signs of Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.