Cited by 39International Law and Human RightsInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyPolitical Conflict and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How Authoritarians Use International Law

Ginsburg, Tom·2020·Journal of Democracy

Abstract

Two great trends of our time are legalization and autocratization. Both these trends are now extending to the level of international governance. As authoritarian regimes wield more power on the international plane, they are turning to international law as a means of shielding themselves from criticism and actively promoting their own illiberal projects. Their strategies include repurposing multilateral institutions, creating new norms, and seeking to assert jurisdiction over their critics abroad. The development of authoritarian international law requires a creative response from democracies that has not yet been forthcoming.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jod.2020.0054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Ginsburg, T.
Corresponding author
Ginsburg, Tom
Venue
Journal of Democracy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2020
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
44-58
ISSN
  • 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3214
OpenAlex
W3091923823
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
authoritarianism, international law, autocratization, legalization, illiberalism, multilateral institutions, international norms, extraterritorial jurisdiction, democracy, international governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Authoritarians Use International Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/jod.2020.0054
The paper
Ginsburg, T. (2020). How Authoritarians Use International Law. Journal of Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0054