Cited by 13Biblical Studies and InterpretationLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisClassical Studies and Philology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Birds and the Babes: The Structure and Meaning of Psalm 8

Kraut, Judah·2010·Jewish Quarterly Review

Abstract

For all its popularity and philosophical depth, Psalm 8 has long posed a number of difficult exegetical challenges. Certain words in the psalm are not easily translated, the structure of the psalm is not readily apparent, and various of its elements seem to defy any obvious explanation most notoriously, the "infants and sucklings" in verse 3a. Faced with the Psalm's many exegetical conundrums, scholars have often indulged in speculative exegesis more so than in compelling textual argument. Indeed, rare is the scholar who does not emend the text of Psalm 8 in some fashion or who dares interpret it without the necessary 'lucidation' provided by another (or many other) biblical or extra-biblical text(s). Yet, the (sometimes valuable) efforts to interpret Psalm 8 in light of more accessible or hypothetical texts have obscured the fact that the psalm, as is, possesses its own internal structure and rhetorical logic, which "properly considered" go a long way toward unraveling the textual enigmas that have long bothered exegetes and readers. This paper contends that an appreciation of the very structure of Psalm 8, a painstakingly crafted chiastic arrangement, elucidates three key elements of its meaning: (a) the role of 3a ("From the mouths of infants and sucklings"); (b) the identity of the "Elohim" in 6a; and (c) the overarching message of the psalm.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jqr.0.0077

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Kraut, J.
Corresponding author
Kraut, Judah
Venue
Jewish Quarterly Review
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2010-12
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
10-24
ISSN
  • 0021-6682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-0604
OpenAlex
W2071442952
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Jewish Quarterly Review (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
Psalm 8, chiasmus, psalm structure, rhetorical structure, Elohim, divine kingship, cosmogony, Hebrew Bible exegesis, textual emendation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review